Stewarts lifts PEP above £1m amid US U-turn one year after launch
Stewarts Law has posted a 29% revenue rise as the litigation boutique moves to scale back its US operations barely a year after launching in the country. The closure of the firm's Delaware office and slimming down of its New York operation, in favour of seeking local alliances, will mean four lawyers will lose their jobs.
July 03, 2013 at 11:49 AM
2 minute read
Stewarts Law has posted a 29% revenue rise as the litigation boutique moves to scale back its US operations barely a year after launching in the country.
The closure of the firm's Delaware office and slimming down of its New York operation, in favour of seeking local alliances, will mean four lawyers will lose their jobs.
In its 2012-13 financial results, profits per equity partner (PEP) reached in excess of £1m for the first time, up by 23% from £909,407 last year to £1.1m. Meanwhile, revenue rose more than £10m, from £35m in 2011-12 to £45.2m. Partners at the top of the equity will take home £1.4m, while net profit also rose 30% from £15.8m to £20.5m.
Commenting on the scaling back of the US operations, which opened in April last year, managing partner John Cahill said: "It is slightly unexpected, but we are changing direction and have decided that having a collaborative model over competition is how we want to proceed."
As a result, the firm has formed a strategic alliance with US plaintiffs firm Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein. Cahill added that Stewarts Law planned to evaluate new areas of tax litigation following a trend in tax disputes fuelled by the economic environment. He has also identified opportunities for other alliances with overseas law firms.
In the next 12 months Cahill said he hoped to reach £50m in turnover and target a net profit of 40%-50%. Over the past year Stewarts has acquired an extra 10,000 sq ft of office space in London and recruited 15 new lawyers. Key lateral hires for the firm have included Philippa Charles from Mayer Brown, who was appointed to head the firm's new international arbitration team.
In September last year the firm hired high-profile family law partner Helen Ward from Manches to join the firm's divorce and family team.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Launches in Amsterdam: Exclusive Interview with Global Chair Eric McCrath
2 minute readHogan Lovells Boosts Corporate and Finance in 2025 Partner Promotions
Trending Stories
- 1Can Passive Technology Change the Impaired Driving Trajectory?
- 2Bradley Arant, Moore & Van Allen Join Partner Promotions Parade
- 37th Circ. Rejects Liability Claims Against Freight Broker's Hiring Choices
- 4Sullivan & Cromwell Signals 5-Day RTO Expectation as Law Firms Remain Split on Optimal Attendance
- 5CLOSED: These Georgia Courts Won't Open Jan. 10
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250