Near-shoring and LPO takes hold as more top 30 firms eye moves
Fifteen of the UK's top 30 law firms by revenue have either set up their own low-cost legal centre or are sending routine legal work to legal process outsourcing (LPO) providers, according to research conducted by Legal Week. Several other leading firms are reviewing their options, including Stephenson Harwood, which is considering opening a low-cost legal centre, and SJ Berwin, which is in early stage talks to outsource its document production team.
July 04, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Half of top 30 now using LPO or low-cost bases as BLP and SJ Berwin consider options
Fifteen of the UK's top 30 law firms by revenue have either set up their own low-cost legal centre or are sending routine legal work to legal process outsourcing (LPO) providers, according to research conducted by Legal Week.
Several other leading firms are reviewing their options, including Norton Rose Fulbright and SJ Berwin, which is in early stage talks to outsource its document production team.
Berwin Leighton Paisner is also looking into its own low-cost centre, as well as the option of referring some legal work to its Lawyers on Demand service.
The survey underlines the extent to which the use of LPO and low-cost legal centres has taken hold among the UK's top law firms as pressure grows from clients, including Royal Bank of Scotland, Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, BT and Land Securities, for law firms to show LPO-type capabilities.
Last month, Ashurst announced that it was taking advantage of a government grant of up to £2.4m to open a low-cost base in Glasgow later this year, making it the fifth top 30 firm to set up a legal services centre, alongside Clifford Chance (New Delhi), Addleshaw Goddard (Manchester), Allen & Overy (Belfast) and Herbert Smith Freehills (Belfast).
Adrian de Souza, general counsel of Land Securities, said: "We wouldn't make it a requirement, but our preference is for the same firm to manage all aspects of an individual asset portfolio throughout its life cycle, so they are more likely to get instructions if they have access to a lower cost base elsewhere."
Allen & Overy global managing partner Wim Dejonghe (pictured) added: "Clients are putting more pressure on the traditional model. Just as they are identifying efficiencies in their own businesses, so we have to look at alternative arrangements and that is an opportunity that will allow firms to grow market share as a result."
Legal Week's research highlights how law firms are adopting a variety of models to cut the cost of conducting low-value legal work such as document review and M&A due diligence.
Olswang operates a panel of LPO providers and also sends some City legal work to its Thames Valley office, while Simmons & Simmons has a Bristol office staffed by partner-led legal teams conducting high-value City-sourced work more economically. Elsewhere, Hogan Lovells has relationships with LPO providers Integreon and Exigent alongside its own 'Mexican wave' scheme, which sees it farm out the routine elements of transactions to a panel of regional law firms.
David Ellis, managing partner of OMC Partners, which advised Ashurst and Addleshaws on the establishment of their low-cost centres, said firms that carried out all elements of legal work efficiently could typically reduce their costs by 20%, thereby allowing them to improve their margins and deliver better value to clients. "This is a huge opportunity for law firms," he added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Further Modifies Lockstep to Better Reward Top Performers
2 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readAggressive, Assertive: Is There a Private Equity Lawyer Stereotype, and is it Deterring Talented Juniors?
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250