Revenues up but PEP down at Watson Farley and Mills & Reeve
Watson, Farley & Williams (WFW) has seen profits per equity partner (PEP) dip by 13% during 2012-13 despite turnover breaking through the £100m barrier for the first time. After posting a PEP figure of £446,000 in 2011-12, average partner pay has slipped to £388,000 following a year in which the firm invested in a new Frankfurt office which opened in January. Revenue, meanwhile, has risen a little over 2% to £102.1m from £99.8 the previous year – a rise which can be partly attributed to its Hong Kong office which was launched in March 2012.
July 05, 2013 at 07:58 AM
2 minute read
Watson Farley & Williams has seen profits per equity partner (PEP) dip by 13% despite turnover breaking through the £100m barrier for the first time.
After posting a figure of £446,000 last year, PEP has now slipped to £388,000 following a year in which the firm invested in a new Frankfurt office which opened in January.
Revenue, meanwhile, has risen by 2% to £102.1m from £99.8m the previous year – a rise which can be partly attributed to the firm's Hong Kong office, which launched in March 2012.
Following the Hong Kong launch, in December the firm took a four-strong litigation team from Holman Fenwick Willan to join the firm's practice in the region.
However, in April it was revealed that the firm had offered a number of its trainees £5,000 to defer the start of their training contracts by one year.
Watson Farley managing partner Michael Greville (pictured) said: "We are pleased to pass the £100m milestone, delivering on our strategy of working with investors, financiers and operators in our core sectors to a consistently high standard across jurisdictions. This level of income represents an increase of over 75% in the five years since 2008.
"Opening two new offices in Hong Kong and in Frankfurt and investment in a number of lateral hire partners last year has, as expected, impacted the firm's profit and average profit per equity partner is set to be around £390,000 this year."
Elsewhere, Mills & Reeve has posted a 2% increase in turnover from £69.4m to £70.9m, while PEP saw a slight fall, down from £326,000 to £324,000.
The figures do not include the 1 June merger with Manchester firm George Davis, which managing partner Guy Hinchley expects to lead to substantial growth this coming financial year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Frontiers: Gaillard Banifatemi Shelbaya Launches in Cairo and Abu Dhabi
4 minute readTravers Gives Holiday Bonus, Ropes & Gray Reduces Time Off Allowance
1 minute readJapan’s Mori Hamada Joins Funder LCM for $150M Credit Suisse Bonds Claim
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250