Partner profits down 15% at Hill Dicks as revenue creeps up
Hill Dickinson saw its profits per equity partner (PEP) slip by 15% over the 2012-13 financial year despite a slight increase in turnover. The firm posted income of £112.8m for the 12-month period ending 30 April, 2% up on the previous year's figure of £110.1m. However, Hill Dickinson's profits took a knock with PEP down to £264,000 from £312,000. The firm's managing partner Peter Jackson attributing this decrease to an increase in overheads and international expansion.
July 08, 2013 at 09:26 AM
2 minute read
Hill Dickinson saw its profits per equity partner (PEP) slip by 15% over the 2012-13 financial year despite a slight increase in turnover.
The firm posted income of £112.8m for the 12-month period ending 30 April, 2% up on the previous year's figure of £110.1m.
However, Hill Dickinson's profits took a knock with PEP down to £264,000 from £312,000. The firm's managing partner Peter Jackson (pictured) attributing this decrease to an increase in overheads and international expansion.
The average number of equity partners across the year rose from 61 to 64 while the size of the firm's entire partnership remained static at 172.
At the start of the year the firm took DLA Piper's 30-strong defendant insurance practice in Sheffield and Manchester and in February announced it is to launch a new office in Monaco in order to build on its yacht and superyacht law offering.
Meanwhile, in April the firm announced a review of its UK business which is expected to result in a large number of lob losses. It is believed that around 60 staff members have taken voluntary redundancy with compulsory redundancies due to follow.
Jackson commented: "The results are a bit of a mixed bag and were particularly disappointing in terms of profit. However, this is understandable, not only because of the difficult market but also due to our increased overheads.
"We recently took a hit due to our imminent premises move in London and reached the end of our incentive period in Liverpool, while we are also continuing with our new Monaco base.
"However, the increase in revenue is to be welcomed and is, in the main, due to strong performances in our three main practice areas of health, marine and insurance."
Jackson was recently re-elected for a third four-year term which commences May 2014.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
Squire Patton Boggs Hires 7-Lawyer Team to Beef Up ESG Practice in Brussels
2 minute readSkadden, White & Case Guide Citigroup Demerger in Mexico
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250