How to turn clicks into clients – the dos and don'ts of thought leadership campaigns
Positive referrals and relationships will always play an important part in generating new business for law firms, but they will not always deliver a consistent flow of work for future growth. In an increasingly competitive market, many law firms have turned to harnessing and distributing online thought leadership exercises to attract the attention of new clients. Unfortunately a lot of firms are still not familiar enough with the available technologies to track any potential interest successfully. Others are cautious about using data capture techniques to generate new leads, fearing that it will deter readers.
July 11, 2013 at 07:03 PM
9 minute read
James Vanderzee spoke to a cross-section of nearly 30 law firms about their online 'thought leadership' campaigns and found they were missing a trick by not tracking readers to generate hard leads
Positive referrals and relationships will always play an important part in generating new business for law firms, but they will not always deliver a consistent flow of work for future growth.
In an increasingly competitive market, many law firms have turned to harnessing and distributing online thought leadership exercises to attract the attention of new clients.
Unfortunately a lot of firms are still not familiar enough with the available technologies to track any potential interest successfully. Others are cautious about using data capture techniques to generate new leads, fearing that it will deter readers.
Existing technology is woefully underused in the legal market but can help optimise content and track readers, allowing for a more targeted push. When used successfully, these can produce a tangible return on investment and real business development opportunities.
It is difficult to understand the online strategies of law firms and there is not much in the way of large-scale research into what UK firms are doing online in relation to business development. But in the US, a 2012 Legal Market Survey Report of 1,300 attorneys and legal marketers by Avvo & LexBlog showed that 23% of firms were generating business via online sites and social media – which is not insubstantial.
For this article we reviewed 21 London firms and interviewed eight others from a cross-section of 'magic circle', mid-tier and US firms to see what kind of thought leadership activities they were engaged in online.
Results showed that most firms were still not tracking their thought leadership activities well enough to gauge exactly what was generating interest and to what extent. Broadly speaking, firms were either unwilling to track users of their content or were completely unaware about what they could be doing to make the most of their content. In addition, we found that there were major variations in the quality of what was on offer.
Of the firms we interviewed, those creating thought leadership online did so mainly for enhancing brand awareness and the development of existing client business, as well as for public relations and hosting related events for clients and contacts. Only two firms, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Olswang, were able to show new business leads as a direct result of their thought leadership activity online, although this appeared to be a positive side-effect rather than a deliberate strategy.
Given the heavy investment needed to produce high-quality thought leadership, it would make sense for firms to use it as a way to generate client leads as well as simply satisfying branding objectives. So what kind of activities could firms be doing?
Have an opinion
First, firms need to spend more time deciding on the best way to create engaging content for their audience. On-site content options are endless, from articles and blog posts to webinars and podcasts but firms, to their detriment, are focusing too much on the topics of interest to them rather than what clients want to see. As Jeffrey Forbes, publishing director at TalklawMedia, says: "Law firms have been producing content to promote their expertise for many years but it can often be too inwardly focused. The foundation of a successful thought leadership programme is high-quality insight, so understanding market trends, influencers and client issues is vital. Firms also need to ensure that content appears in front of the right decision maker at the right time."
To be more engaging firms probably need to focus less on providing commentary and more on giving an expert opinion. Thought leadership needs to show fresh perspectives and challenge the client's own thinking as well as highlight problems that they may not have identified themselves. This can be a challenge for many practice-focused lawyers who either are not comfortable writing truly commercial and analytical content, or who are too cautious to predict outcomes and take a real stance on a subject.
Be a specialist
Even within specific practice areas, the law is so broad that the danger is to try to cover everything. Having a niche is a great way to test a thought leadership strategy and help the marketing and new business departments familiarise themselves with the related technologies and processes.
Being focused and consistent will result in higher search engine rankings, greater recognition and more website traffic for the subject matter. Association with particular issues, and talking about them in depth over a period of time, will develop and promote a distinctive perspective on chosen specialisms.
Where time or budgets may be restricted, firms could focus on subjects that may seem controversial, under-researched or where other firms are not so forthcoming with their views.
Think about Google
Search engine optimisation (SEO) of content should be a top priority for firms that want to attract new clients looking into a specific subject. If would-be clients are looking for thought leadership in a given area, firms should make it easy for them to find.
Google is usually the first port of call for searches. Firms need to follow best practice in SEO if they want to ensure their content shows up prominently for a particular keyword or phrase. This includes a blend of 'on-site', such as websites, and 'off-site', such as Twitter.
If a thought leadership piece is topical and/or new, it may be difficult to gain traction purely through SEO. In these instances, paid search (aka Pay Per Click or PPC marketing) can guarantee an appearance on page one for a range of keywords.
While most of the websites we reviewed were reasonably well-optimised, none of the firms we spoke to was actively engaged in a keyword strategy – for SEO or paid search.
Twitter away
Website, or 'on-site', content plays an important role in thought leadership activity but websites do not always attract the right people when they are wanted. Firms must also think about publishing 'off-site' to find and engage readers. This includes search, third-party websites, content syndicators and social media. Most of the firms we spoke to offered regular news emails. Reassuringly, of the 21 firms we reviewed all had a presence on LinkedIn and Twitter – though with variable effect. Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton has yet to tweet while Olswang allows its entire partnership to do so at will. Barney O'Kelly, digital strategist at Freshfields, says: "LinkedIn and Twitter are great for our partners to build their personal reputation alongside the firm's brand, sharing their own expertise and opinions directly with our audiences."
Turn 'reads' into leads
Beyond engaging with social media, how is it possible for firms to actually convert 'reads' to leads? To do so they must start collecting data on readers. But the big problem for the legal market is that thought leadership is not really considered valuable enough to put behind data capture forms, which require the input of email addresses and can therefore be used for new business purposes. There is just too much competing content around. Some firms have found that asking people to register or log on had a detrimental effect on the number of people reading content, so they have chosen to make their content easily available.
To overcome this, firms should improve the quality of what they are producing, focusing on a few key areas, and think about introducing tiered content. Then they can offer more complex and sensitive opinions with some value-adds, all positioned behind data capture forms. The market shows that people are willing to pay or register details in exchange for high-quality content.
After an email address is known, nurturing a lead via a pre-specified series of automated emails can help build a clearer view of interest ahead of any approaches.
Track the readers
Once firms do start capturing data, there is plenty of off-the-shelf technology to help measure, analyse and optimise all aspects of their thought leadership activity. These technologies include content marketing systems which bring everything together within one central dashboard. With a good call-tracking solution, firms could link enquiries and sales directly to specific pieces of content.
This ability to monitor the effectiveness of each channel in attracting visitors and leads is becoming increasingly important. All of the firm websites we reviewed – with the surprising exception of Latham & Watkins, which was more advanced than the others in its organisation of thought leadership – had website tracking such as Google Analytics and Webtrends in place. These monitor user journeys and identify where visitors and conversions (downloads, registrations and enquiries) are coming from. But this is only part of the picture.
There is an array of technology available to help firms measure, analyse and optimise every aspect of their thought leadership activity. And dozens of off-the-shelf tools can help paint a clearer picture of how people are engaging with your content and help nurture leads into prospects. While law firms have yet to explore these opportunities, other smaller professional services are making the leap.
Bridge the gap
Firms could gain a competitive advantage through clever sales and marketing models on the web, combining thought leadership with web technologies that can help bridge, and even narrow, the gap between content marketing and new business.
A successful online thought leadership campaign combines exceptional and unique content which becomes highly sought after, as well as search engine optimisation techniques, social media and data capture to attract and nurture prospective clients. It should be produced with the intention of generating further leads.
Taking a holistic approach firms should be looking to bridge the gap between the marketing and IT departments by investing in digital talent. Without the latest technology, content, tracking and social media tools, thought leadership campaigns will never produce the investment return for the time and effort they require.
James Vanderzee is a web strategist with 15 years' experience. His consultancy company, Vie Digital, works with businesses to help them generate leads and sales online.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250