Litigation venture launched by Hogan Lovells duo makes all-staff profit payout
Commercial litigation practice Signature Litigation has confirmed significant profit rewards to all of its staff under a collaborative remuneration model set up by the firm on its launch last year. Signature - which was launched by former Hogan Lovells litigation partners Graham Huntley (pictured) and Helen Brannigan in April last year - has confirmed that all of its 26 staff have received a profit share ranging from 21.1% to 36.1% of their salary, following a strong financial performance in its first year since launch.
July 29, 2013 at 07:23 AM
2 minute read
Commercial litigation practice Signature Litigation has confirmed significant profit rewards to all of its staff under a collaborative remuneration model set up by the firm on its launch last year.
Signature – which was launched by former Hogan Lovells litigation partners Graham Huntley (pictured) and Helen Brannigan in April last year – has confirmed that all of its 26 staff have received a profit share ranging from 21.1% to 36.1% of their salary, following a strong financial performance in its first year since launch.
More than half of the firm's full-time fee-earners received the top reward of 36.1%.
The practice operates two additional reward schemes, one for exceptional performance and the other for exceeding working hours. In the latter, staff have been paid up to 15% of their basic salary.
The profit sharing scheme, which was set up when Signature was launched, was intended to give all partners and associates a stake in the firm, while all staff have been involved in the firm's future budget plans. The firm said it expects to take on more staff throughout the year and will release its financial results later in the year.
Huntley and Brannigan left Hogan Lovells last March to set up the new venture with a team of associates. The idea was to create a dedicated commercial litigation practice, without the conflict issues associated with full-service law firms.
CEO Kevin Munslow – the former Olswang CEO who joined Signature for its launch last year – said: "It was exciting putting Signature Litigation together because Graham Huntley had a vision of developing a culture through a simple and transparent profit sharing scheme that captured everybody in the business. The strong financial performance in the start-up is not only impressive but has vindicated our innovative approach that the partners were fully committed to."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250