Damage control – how law firms can reduce their risk of costly negligence claims
Claims against solicitors can be expensive, not just in terms of damages and costs, but also in terms of reputation risks, the amount of time likely to be spent dealing with the claim and a resultant increase in professional indemnity insurance (PII) premiums. A good place to start for any firm concerned about its risk profile and wishing to improve its risk management is to identify the top 10 risks faced by the firm and then consider the steps necessary to minimise those risks. For those with serious concerns, there are specialist risk management firms that can audit firms and prepare risk reports. A firm's risk profile will vary depending on its size and personnel, and the type of work. Property work is the most common source of claims, and commercial and financial work can give rise to the most costly claims; but all areas carry risk.
August 01, 2013 at 07:03 PM
6 minute read
Michael Harvey offers a step-by-step guide for law firms looking to minimise their professional negligence risks and cut their insurance premiums
Claims against solicitors can be expensive, not just in terms of damages and costs, but also in terms of reputation risks, the amount of time likely to be spent dealing with the claim and a resultant increase in professional indemnity insurance (PII) premiums.
A good place to start for any firm concerned about its risk profile and wishing to improve its risk management is to identify the top 10 risks faced by the firm and then consider the steps necessary to minimise those risks. For those with serious concerns, there are specialist risk management firms that can audit firms and prepare risk reports.
A firm's risk profile will vary depending on its size and personnel, and the type of work. Property work is the most common source of claims, and commercial and financial work can give rise to the most costly claims; but all areas carry risk.
Negligence claims can arise for many reasons of course. Common examples include missing limitation dates, undersettlements, failure to advise, drafting and administrative errors. It is in fact relatively uncommon for a solicitor to face a claim based on actually getting the law wrong.
The risk of exposure to negligence claims cannot be entirely extinguished, but there are steps firms can take to reduce risk, many of which are simple common sense, but which are overlooked surprisingly often. Some of these are set out below:
Clients
1. Carry out checks on a prospective client, ensuring you consider the source of any referral and/or how and why the client approached the firm. Are there any conflicts that prevent you from representing them?
2. Consider whether any prospective client is suitable and matches the firm's client profile.
3. Carry out and document the necessary money laundering checks.
Instruction and scope of retainer
4. Make sure your client has provided, and continues to provide, clear and timely instructions. Are their goals clear and realistic?
5. Ensure that a clear fee arrangement is agreed in advance and send clear and comprehensive client engagement letters and terms of business.
6. Clearly define the scope of your retainer, including what you have and have not agreed to do. Keep this under review.
7. Make sure your client is aware of its own obligations and advise it of the potential consequences if it fails to meet them, eg failure to meet a deadline. This is particularly the case in the brave new post-Jackson world where it seems the courts are, as expected, taking a tough line on delays and missed deadlines.
Matter handling
8. Allocate the matter to someone with appropriate expertise and experience.
9. Keep written records of all advice given, following up oral advice in writing. This should include keeping clear and accurate notes of all telephone attendances and meetings. Claims often turn on a lack of written notes.
10. A good diary system is essential to capture and flag up key dates, and for others to be alerted if the person dealing with the matter is absent.
11. Make sure everyone keeps up to date with the latest developments within their own area of expertise. This includes not only developments in the law, but also procedural developments, such as those introduced with the Jackson reforms. Lack of knowledge will be no excuse.
Supervision and review
12. A good system of supervision is essential. A supervisor with appropriate competence and experience should be allocated to each fee earner, including senior partners as well as newly qualified lawyers.
13. An open-door policy is no substitute for a structured system of proactive supervision, including monthly file reviews and review meetings.
14. The system should be documented and the outcomes of the reviews recorded. File auditing, either by internal or external auditors, with documented audit trails, can be an invaluable risk management and supervision tool.
Documents
15. Files and electronic documents should be secure from unauthorised access.
16. Document, IT and data protection policies should be in place and enforced.
17. Files should be in good order, filing kept up to date and key dates clearly marked.
18. Have a written disaster recovery/business continuity plan.
Insurance
19. Certain types of work and certain jurisdictions will not be covered by the firm's PII cover. It is therefore vital that the work carried out by the firm does not stray beyond the scope covered by its PII policy.
20. Make sure someone in the firm is responsible for dealing with its PII insurance, knows the terms of the policy, and makes sure all relevant staff are aware of the requirement to notify the responsible person as soon as they become aware of a circumstance that could give rise to a claim.
Compliance
Compliance is outside the scope of this article, but it should be noted that Principle 8 of the Solicitors Regulation Authority's new outcomes-focused regulatory regime requires that firms must run their businesses "with proper governance and sound financial risk management principles", and we should all by now be familiar with the requirements of firms to have appointed compliance officers for legal practice (COLPs) and compliance officers for finance and administration (COFAs), with responsibility for ensuring the firm has adequate systems and controls in place.
An onerous burden?
This may all seem onerous, but it is surely worth it to reduce the risk of costly and damaging negligence claims; and good risk management can benefit the firm in other ways.
PII insurers are increasingly interested in a firm's risk management processes and procedures. If a firm is able to demonstrate that it has properly thought through its risk management, this is likely to impress a prospective PII insurer and result in significantly reduced PII premiums. Good risk management cannot be achieved instantly, and requires all those working within the firm to buy into a culture of risk management – and this must be led from the top.
Michael Harvey is a professional negligence partner at Berrymans Lace Mawer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250