Damage control – how law firms can reduce their risk of costly negligence claims
Claims against solicitors can be expensive, not just in terms of damages and costs, but also in terms of reputation risks, the amount of time likely to be spent dealing with the claim and a resultant increase in professional indemnity insurance (PII) premiums. A good place to start for any firm concerned about its risk profile and wishing to improve its risk management is to identify the top 10 risks faced by the firm and then consider the steps necessary to minimise those risks. For those with serious concerns, there are specialist risk management firms that can audit firms and prepare risk reports. A firm's risk profile will vary depending on its size and personnel, and the type of work. Property work is the most common source of claims, and commercial and financial work can give rise to the most costly claims; but all areas carry risk.
August 01, 2013 at 07:03 PM
6 minute read
Michael Harvey offers a step-by-step guide for law firms looking to minimise their professional negligence risks and cut their insurance premiums
Claims against solicitors can be expensive, not just in terms of damages and costs, but also in terms of reputation risks, the amount of time likely to be spent dealing with the claim and a resultant increase in professional indemnity insurance (PII) premiums.
A good place to start for any firm concerned about its risk profile and wishing to improve its risk management is to identify the top 10 risks faced by the firm and then consider the steps necessary to minimise those risks. For those with serious concerns, there are specialist risk management firms that can audit firms and prepare risk reports.
A firm's risk profile will vary depending on its size and personnel, and the type of work. Property work is the most common source of claims, and commercial and financial work can give rise to the most costly claims; but all areas carry risk.
Negligence claims can arise for many reasons of course. Common examples include missing limitation dates, undersettlements, failure to advise, drafting and administrative errors. It is in fact relatively uncommon for a solicitor to face a claim based on actually getting the law wrong.
The risk of exposure to negligence claims cannot be entirely extinguished, but there are steps firms can take to reduce risk, many of which are simple common sense, but which are overlooked surprisingly often. Some of these are set out below:
Clients
1. Carry out checks on a prospective client, ensuring you consider the source of any referral and/or how and why the client approached the firm. Are there any conflicts that prevent you from representing them?
2. Consider whether any prospective client is suitable and matches the firm's client profile.
3. Carry out and document the necessary money laundering checks.
Instruction and scope of retainer
4. Make sure your client has provided, and continues to provide, clear and timely instructions. Are their goals clear and realistic?
5. Ensure that a clear fee arrangement is agreed in advance and send clear and comprehensive client engagement letters and terms of business.
6. Clearly define the scope of your retainer, including what you have and have not agreed to do. Keep this under review.
7. Make sure your client is aware of its own obligations and advise it of the potential consequences if it fails to meet them, eg failure to meet a deadline. This is particularly the case in the brave new post-Jackson world where it seems the courts are, as expected, taking a tough line on delays and missed deadlines.
Matter handling
8. Allocate the matter to someone with appropriate expertise and experience.
9. Keep written records of all advice given, following up oral advice in writing. This should include keeping clear and accurate notes of all telephone attendances and meetings. Claims often turn on a lack of written notes.
10. A good diary system is essential to capture and flag up key dates, and for others to be alerted if the person dealing with the matter is absent.
11. Make sure everyone keeps up to date with the latest developments within their own area of expertise. This includes not only developments in the law, but also procedural developments, such as those introduced with the Jackson reforms. Lack of knowledge will be no excuse.
Supervision and review
12. A good system of supervision is essential. A supervisor with appropriate competence and experience should be allocated to each fee earner, including senior partners as well as newly qualified lawyers.
13. An open-door policy is no substitute for a structured system of proactive supervision, including monthly file reviews and review meetings.
14. The system should be documented and the outcomes of the reviews recorded. File auditing, either by internal or external auditors, with documented audit trails, can be an invaluable risk management and supervision tool.
Documents
15. Files and electronic documents should be secure from unauthorised access.
16. Document, IT and data protection policies should be in place and enforced.
17. Files should be in good order, filing kept up to date and key dates clearly marked.
18. Have a written disaster recovery/business continuity plan.
Insurance
19. Certain types of work and certain jurisdictions will not be covered by the firm's PII cover. It is therefore vital that the work carried out by the firm does not stray beyond the scope covered by its PII policy.
20. Make sure someone in the firm is responsible for dealing with its PII insurance, knows the terms of the policy, and makes sure all relevant staff are aware of the requirement to notify the responsible person as soon as they become aware of a circumstance that could give rise to a claim.
Compliance
Compliance is outside the scope of this article, but it should be noted that Principle 8 of the Solicitors Regulation Authority's new outcomes-focused regulatory regime requires that firms must run their businesses "with proper governance and sound financial risk management principles", and we should all by now be familiar with the requirements of firms to have appointed compliance officers for legal practice (COLPs) and compliance officers for finance and administration (COFAs), with responsibility for ensuring the firm has adequate systems and controls in place.
An onerous burden?
This may all seem onerous, but it is surely worth it to reduce the risk of costly and damaging negligence claims; and good risk management can benefit the firm in other ways.
PII insurers are increasingly interested in a firm's risk management processes and procedures. If a firm is able to demonstrate that it has properly thought through its risk management, this is likely to impress a prospective PII insurer and result in significantly reduced PII premiums. Good risk management cannot be achieved instantly, and requires all those working within the firm to buy into a culture of risk management – and this must be led from the top.
Michael Harvey is a professional negligence partner at Berrymans Lace Mawer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Eighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
- 2Superior Court Re-examines Death of a Party Pending a Divorce Action
- 3Chicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
- 4GOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
- 5Houston-Based Law Firm Overcomes Defamation Suit for Website Warning
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250