McKenna Long & Aldridge eyes Shanghai for China debut
McKenna Long & Aldridge (MLA) is applying for a licence to open in Shanghai as it looks to join the raft of international law firms doing business in China. The US outfit said in a statement it was in the process of applying to the authorities for a licence, but gave no details as to the status of the application or when it expected to open.
August 04, 2013 at 11:41 PM
3 minute read
McKenna Long & Aldridge (MLA) is applying for a licence to open in Shanghai as it looks to join the raft of international law firms doing business in China.
The US outfit said in a statement it was in the process of applying to the authorities for a licence, but gave no details as to the status of the application or when it expected to open.
Shanghai will be the firm's first office in China and its second in Asia after Korea, which it launched in March with corporate partner Andrew Park leading.
The firm said it already had a significant China-focused team based outside of China including eight Mandarin speakers, and that it currently advised a number of Chinese companies operating in the US capital markets.
With the help of the Bay Area Council – a San Francisco based public policy organization which has deep roots in China - MLA has also been able to secure an office location in the Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC) in Shanghai's Yangpu district – home to 14 major universities and colleges.
"The planned opening of our Shanghai office is a result of continued client demand," said the head of the firm's China-US transactional practice Tom Wardell.
"There is a clear increase in transactional activity involving Chinese-based companies."
The firm's chairman, Jeff Haidet added: "The planned opening of our Shanghai office is another step in strategically expanding the services we provide and the value we add to clients and their businesses.
"We have a significant number of Chinese clients and we hope to leverage our presence in Shanghai to their benefit and to the benefit of other Chinese and US companies seeking access to both markets."
China has attracted a wave of international law firms in the last decade as a surge of inbound and outbound investment has created opportunities for international and local advisors.
In the early years, the strategy was typically to target Shanghai for work and with a focus on inbound investment deals, though in recent years the majority of new market entrants have looked to the capital Beijing and for deals involving Chinese companies buying assets abroad.
Last month, energy specialists in the region Vinson & Elkins said they would close their Shanghai office in a bid to concentrate their efforts on Beijing, since this was where most of their clients were located.
Once open, MLA's Shanghai office will expand the firm's geographic reach to 16 offices in 14 markets.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250