KPMG targets corporate lawyer hires as accountant mulls ABS move
KPMG is looking to recruit a team of corporate lawyers in Manchester as the accountancy giant weighs up an alternative business structure (ABS) conversion as part of a push to expand its legal services offering. The big four accountancy firm is recruiting for a Manchester-based team of four or five corporate lawyers to work alongside its tax advisers as non-practising solicitors.
August 06, 2013 at 09:58 AM
3 minute read
KPMG is looking to recruit a team of corporate lawyers in Manchester as the accountancy giant weighs up an alternative business structure (ABS) conversion as part of a push to expand its legal services offering.
The big four accountancy firm is recruiting for a Manchester-based team of four or five corporate lawyers to work alongside its tax advisers as non-practising solicitors.
Recruiters in Manchester have been tasked with scouring the local market for a well-established partner-level corporate lawyer to lead the new team, which will focus on intra-group reorganisations.
The accountancy giant is also considering applying for an ABS licence, which would open up the option for it to re-enter the UK legal market a decade after severing ties with its international legal network KLegal.
KLegal was launched in 1999 before KPMG split from the 3,000-lawyer network in 2003 due to "unworkable regulatory constraints" ushered in by the introduction of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. KLegal's UK business merged with associated Scots firm McGrigor Donald in 2002 to form McGrigors.
One senior partner in Manchester said: "I suspect KPMG won't be in the market to compete on the high street, but [this new operation] would instead act as an internal team to advise large groups for which it would normally use top-end law firms. This in itself won't have a big impact; however, that would all change should it apply for an ABS licence.
"Making an application could indicate it has plans for a separate legal arm, which in the long-term it could grow and develop into a law firm."
However, one senior partner at a UK-wide law firm cautioned: "KLegal cost KPMG a lot of money to set up and then a lot of money to exit – what has changed? It could cripple them in terms of referral opportunities on deals."
KPMG also employs a number of lawyers in its London-based commercial, tax litigation and employment teams, and is currently looking to recruit three additional lawyers.
According to the job advertisement for one of the roles, the firm is aiming to expand its existing corporate, commercial, employment and tax litigation teams. "Over the next few years, these teams will grow and legal services will expand into other areas of law that fit within its vision and the needs of KPMG's clients," the advert states.
KPMG also offers legal services in countries including Spain, Canada, Belarus and Estonia.
In a statement, KPMG said: "KPMG's tax practice has long had a number of non-practising solicitors working with their colleagues in the tax team nationwide. This includes the Manchester office where we have had a tax litigation capability for at least the past ten years. In addition to tax litigation support we have a small team of corporate and employment non-practising solicitors to help us provide multi-disciplinary services (usually around intra-group reorganisations) to clients where required and we predict increased demand for this support.
"We have valued and important relationships with law firms, working with them across KPMG on a day-to-day basis on a range of projects and we anticipate this continuing, indeed increasing given the regulatory environment in which we operate."
Big four accountancy rival PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) operates a separate legal arm, PwC Legal, which provides a range of legal services including immigration, corporate, finance and regulation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSetting Standards: Vanguard Australia's Sean Hughes on Moving From Government Regulator to Corporate General Counsel
6 minute readNetflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250