Making your British Legal Awards entry stand out from the crowd
With the entry deadlines for the British Legal Awards and the African Legal Awards looming, John Malpas offers six top tips for awards success...
August 07, 2013 at 09:52 AM
6 minute read
With the entry deadlines for the British Legal Awards and the African Legal Awards looming, John Malpas offers six top tips for awards success
The British Legal Awards (BLA) judges are usually fastidious in the observance of their duties.
But on one occasion a few years ago one of the judges pitched up for the judging without even having looked at the entries in the mistaken belief that that he would have time to peruse them on the day. Thinking on his feet, he quipped that at this late stage of his career he wasn't going to end the habit of a lifetime and arrive at a board meeting having actually read the papers.
There is always one exception that proves the rule as the judges invariably do study the entries carefully, often burning through the midnight oil in the process as they juggle with their busy schedules.
Given that well over half the BLA judges are general counsel of leading companies, this presents law firms with the opportunity to tell a select group of clients or prospective clients how well they are doing. Conversely, if they submit ill-thought out entries they may end up damaging a valued relationship. With the deadlines for entry to the BLA and the African Legal Awards less than a month away, here are Legal Week's top tips for awards success.
It is a serious business
For the reasons set out above, if you're not going to take the process of entering awards seriously, then leave them well alone. Boilerplate entries obviously modelled on directory submissions where the only variation is the name of the awards entered – and sometimes even that detail is overlooked – will simply irritate the judges.
Be selective
Choose the categories you enter carefully. It seems obvious, but it is worth noting that some categories attract more entries than others. Last year, the BLA's Law Firm Innovation Award was the most popular category attracting nearly 40 entries. The most popular practice area categories were M&A Team of the Year, Banking, Finance or Restructuring Team of the Year and Litigation & Regulatory Team of the Year.
Competition is obviously a good thing and the steady rise in the number of entries for the BLA has no doubt helped raise the standard of the shortlisted entries, a phenomenon several judges remarked upon last year. That doesn't mean you shouldn't enter the most hard-fought categories, just that you need to enter the fray with your eyes open, aware that you will need to have an exceptional entry to succeed. Conversely, it will surely pay off to scrutinise some of the less mainstream categories to see whether they play to particular strengths within your firm or legal department.
"Awards are a good way for firms to win recognition in new markets when they are up against established players," says Paul Jaffa, of Myddleton Communications. "But firms have to be strategic in their approach. They should choose credible awards and they should choose the categories to enter carefully so that they are playing to their strengths rather than massaging internal egos."
Follow the criteria
As Alasdair Douglas (pictured), chairman of the BLA judges, puts it: "Read the exam question". In other words, study the criteria and make sure the entry addresses all the points. For awards run by Legal Week, the judges are given a score sheet that lists the criteria and invites them to mark each entry against them. The final decision is made by the judges when they meet, but the exercise helps ensure all the judges approach the process in a consistent manner. "If you haven't addressed all the criteria, it is very easy for the judges to set your entry aside however good aspects of it are," warns Douglas.
Be different
Take care to explain what is unique, unusual or exceptional about your entry. Judges will invariably be drawn to anything in your entry that is out of the ordinary. It might help to imagine the judges reading through your entry at midnight on the evening before the judging day and think of ways to catch their attention. And it is no good burying the interesting bits half-way through the entry as you may have lost them by that stage.
If you are writing about a deal, perhaps start your narrative at the most interesting part or begin with a bold statement that underlines just how important it was. "Judges are looking for something unique and unusual about your entry," says Douglas. "If it is a deal and it is one company buying another company then that isn't particularly interesting; if it is the largest deal of its kind, that is quite interesting; but if it is the first time something has ever been done, then that is very interesting."
Remember the clients
"Quite a large number of the judges are in-house lawyers and they are particularly keen to see how a particular transaction has helped the client," observes Douglas. Former BLA judges chairman Bill Knight made the same point in a video he recorded with Legal Week in 2009: "We'd like to know what it did for the client. It may have been a wonderful transaction from a legal point of view but did the client achieve its aims?" Client references in the form of a quote from a general counsel or chief executive are also a common ingredient of successful entries.
Write in plain English and avoid jargon
Entries are not short stories, so there are no prizes for flowery language. However, no law firm or legal department can succeed without being able to communicate effectively and this should be reflected in the quality of the submission itself. Lay out can also help. For example, sub-headings that speak to the criteria will reinforce the message that the entry has been well-structured. It is not part of the entry criteria for entries to be well designed. But submissions from law firms that have not been sent to a design department are becoming increasingly rare.
The deadline for entries to the African Legal Awards is 31 August and the deadline for British Legal Awards entries is 6 September.
- Click here for all the details on entering The British Legal Awards, booking a table or sponsorship enquiries.
- Click here for information about the African Legal Awards
- Click here to watch Bill Knight's interview with Legal Week on how to submit effective awards entries
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHong Kong IPO Market Shows Signs of Slow but Steady Recovery
Can AI Beat the Billable Hour? Legal Tech Firms Say Selling AI Products to Law Firms Still a Challenge
More Young Lawyers Are Entering Big Law With Mental Health Issues. Are Firms Ready to Accommodate Them?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250