A&O trims annual trainee intake for third time in four years
Allen & Overy (A&O) has announced that it will trim back the number of trainees it takes on from 2015, as the firm joins Olswang and Wragge & Co in confirming retention rates for its autumn qualifiers. The magic circle firm will recruit 85 trainees per year as of 2015, down from the current annual intake of 90.
August 15, 2013 at 11:34 AM
3 minute read
Allen & Overy (A&O) has announced that it will trim back the number of trainees it takes on from 2015, as the firm joins Olswang and Wragge & Co in confirming retention rates for its autumn qualifiers.
The magic circle firm will recruit 85 trainees per year as of 2015, down from the current annual intake of 90, with the decision coming after the firm two years ago announced it would scale back the number of London training contracts it offers from 105 to 90 from 2014.
The latest move marks A&O's third reduction in graduate recruitment in four years, after it also announced at the height of the financial crisis in 2009 that it would cut its trainee intake from 120 to 105 from 2011. The fall from 120 to 85 marks a combined drop of almost 30%.
A&O graduate recruitment partner Richard Hough (pictured) said: "We aim to recruit for the long-term as well as providing a high quality training contract. Managing our intake numbers means that we aren't just offering our trainees excellent training and experience, but also a strong prospect of a long-term career with the firm after qualification".
Magic circle counterpart Clifford Chance also last December confirmed that it will reduce the target number of graduate trainees for its 2015 intake, with the new figure set at 100, down from a target of 120.
The news comes alongside confirmation of A&O's retention figures for its September intake. Of a 54-strong cohort, 51 applied to qualify, with the firm offering jobs to 45. Thirty-nine of the group accepted the offer, equating to a retention rate of 72%.
A&O training principal David Campbell said: "The job market for NQs continues to be tough but we are pleased to have been able to offer jobs to so many of our trainees. A number of this year's intake decided not to accept offers, so our retention rate is lower than we expected."
Elsewhere, Olswang and Wragges have also announced the details of their autumn qualifying intakes.
Olswang is keeping on 55% of its September NQs after offering jobs to seven of 11 qualifiers, of which six accepted. The group staying on include three in real estate, two in commercial and one in corporate.
The firm added that it is supporting those leaving the firm in their search for a new job, with three of the five already securing positions elsewhere.
Global HR director Ffion Griffith said: "We have been working in the last couple of years to make sure that our graduate recruitment scheme is in line with the changing needs of the legal market and the firm's adapting requirements. We have been reducing the size of our trainee intake, but have also included the MA in Law with Business in the programme, therefore giving trainees a strong understanding of the commercial backdrop to their legal training and to the industries in which our clients operate."
Meanwhile, Wragges is retaining 11 NQs from a group of 16 qualifiers, resulting in a 69% rate. The firm stated that it had offered jobs to all 16, but the five who turned down the offer had wanted to work in a different practice area or change location.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250