Hong Kong eyes Tesco law as Law Society mulls UK-style ABS reforms
Law firms in Hong Kong may soon be permitted to operate as alternative business structures (ABS) under reforms similar to those that have transformed the UK legal market. The Hong Kong Law Society is currently studying the ABS model, which in the UK permits law firms to take external investment from, and be owned by, non-lawyers, as well as allowing companies to offer legal services.
September 12, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Lawyers confident Hong Kong market would gain competitive advantage from changes
Law firms in Hong Kong may soon be permitted to operate as alternative business structures (ABS) under reforms similar to those that have transformed the UK legal market.
The Hong Kong Law Society is currently studying the ABS model, which in the UK permits law firms to take external investment from, and be owned by, non-lawyers, as well as allowing companies to offer legal services.
President Ambrose Lam told Legal Week that the society had been considering the changes for the past two years, and was now preparing a paper on the issue for the society's council to consider.
Proposals set for discussion could allow Hong Kong firms to set up with and raise funds from non-lawyers, and allow non-law firms to provide legal services.
"We have been studying this for the past two years," he said. "But UK law firms with an office in Hong Kong are asking: 'If the parent company chose to have an ABS model, how do we treat the local branch?'
"We are studying the pros and cons. If the council agrees to go in this direction, it will become law. [We are also considering legal disciplinary practices, which allow law firms to have] up to 25% non-lawyers, and only approved non-legal professions are allowed to provide a service in the law firm."
Rules allowing UK firms to operate as ABSs came into force in January 2012 in the wake of the 2007 Legal Services Act, while similar reforms were enacted in Australia as far back as 2001, leading to the landmark 2007 float of personal injury firm Slater & Gordon.
Slaters managing director Andrew Grech (pictured) said he believed such reforms would be a welcome development for the Hong Kong market. "The experience in Australia and the UK is that it has provided benefits for firms both large and small," he said. "It is very progressive and correct for the Hong Kong Law Society to look at these questions and move in this direction.
"There is an inevitability about it. If I was a Hong Kong lawyer, I would want to have a regulatory structure available to me that allows me to compete with lawyers in Australia and the UK on equal terms. The risk for Hong Kong lawyers if they don't move this way is that they will be disadvantaged in their ability to compete over time."
UK firms with offices in Hong Kong that have expressed an interest in the ABS model include Kennedys and Withers.
"In England, this issue is a hot topic for us and has been for some time," said Withers Hong Kong managing partner Marcus Dearle. "If this model were to be allowed in Hong Kong, we would certainly consider a change.
"As a litigator, being able to instruct a forensic accountant, for example, in-house would definitely have some merits. The more people you can have working in a law firm in different professions is something to be looked at very carefully."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Leaders Stress the Importance of the Rule of Law Amid Geopolitical Tensions
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Trending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250