Law firm use of service companies faces scrutiny in tax avoidance clampdown
The use of service companies by limited liability partnerships (LLPs) could be outlawed in the UK Government's latest clampdown on tax avoidance. Danny Alexander, chief secretary to the treasury, confirmed the move at the Liberal Democrats' annual conference this week, saying: "We will be closing the loophole that allows partners in partnerships to structure their staff arrangements so that they avoid the correct amount of income tax. It's wrong, it's unfair, and it's got to stop."
September 20, 2013 at 10:42 AM
2 minute read
The use of service companies by limited liability partnerships (LLPs) could be outlawed in the UK Government's latest clampdown on tax avoidance.
Danny Alexander, chief secretary to the treasury, confirmed the move at the Liberal Democrats' annual conference this week, saying: "We will be closing the loophole that allows partners in partnerships to structure their staff arrangements so that they avoid the correct amount of income tax. It's wrong, it's unfair, and it's got to stop."
The Treasury is currently engaged in a consultation on partnership tax, with draft legislation expected in the autumn ahead of the introduction of the new regime for the next financial year. Giles Murphy (pictured), head of professional practices at Smith & Williamson, said that it was likely that any changes to taxation of service companies would be included with that legislation.
The use of service companies by law firms and other professional services firms is widespread, with a typical structure seeing the service company engage employees to sell their services to the law firm LLP at a profit, thus transferring the profit earned away from the LLP and into the company, which is taxed at corporation rates rather than income tax rates.
Colin Ives, professional services partner at BDO, commented: "While the actual amounts of tax involved are not that great, it will affect most law firms as they tend to use service companies. It is a cost saving that they will miss when it is gone."
Murphy added: "The proposals as drafted would create a one-sided adjustment in favour of HMRC, whereby the service company would pay tax as before, but the partnership would not receive a deduction. All firms with service companies will therefore need to review the arrangements promptly."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250