HSF set to overhaul partner pay in post-merger shake-up
Herbert Smith Freehills is set to introduce a merit-based element to partner pay as part of its post-merger restructuring, in a clear departure from legacy Herbert Smith's rigid eight-year lockstep. The system will take into account a number of factors including financial performance and business development, engagement with staff, client servicing and contribution to the success of others, bringing the firm closer to merger partner Freehills' system, which is more heavily linked to individual performance. The new 'balanced scorecard' system has been given the go-ahead by management and comes as proposals on the wider remuneration structure are due to be put to partners.
September 26, 2013 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
New system with performance-based element gets green light
Herbert Smith Freehills is set to introduce a merit-based element to partner pay as part of its post-merger restructuring, in a clear departure from legacy Herbert Smith's rigid eight-year lockstep.
The system will take into account a number of factors including financial performance and business development, engagement with staff, client servicing and contribution to the success of others, bringing the firm closer to merger partner Freehills' system, which is more heavily linked to individual performance.
The new 'balanced scorecard' system has been given the go-ahead by management and comes as proposals on the wider remuneration structure are due to be put to partners.
The plan currently being thrashed out at management level would see the introduction of a modified lockstep with a single profit pool. It will be put to a partner vote by the end of the year, with partners suggesting it will take place at the end of November – later than October as previously speculated.
The new structure is expected to take effect from 1 May 2014 and comes as several firms, including Norton Rose Fulbright and Hogan Lovells, have moved to more merit-based pay systems following major mergers.
One partner within the firm said: "Everybody will benefit from the single profit pool – the percentage of allocation according to different parts of the firm will be no different to what we had in the legacy firms. The process is heading in the right direction but there are always going to be some objections from partners."
The Australian arm currently operates a policy where partners are given a number of credits that they can allocate to other partners who have made a significant contribution to the firm. The points individual partners are awarded have no financial value but are taken into account when the firm sets their remuneration. It is unclear whether this system will continue when the new measures are brought in, with some partners suggesting it could be an option further down the line.
The proposals come after legacy Herbert Smith equity partners were called on to pay in £2,000 per equity point in a bid to improve the firm's capital structure and better align the two parts of the business. The move will ensure higher levels of partner capitalisation, reducing the need for holding back partner distributions to fund investment.
The new system will come into effect alongside a new leadership as current CEOs Gavin Bell and David Willis prepare to retire in April 2014. A new CEO or joint CEOs will be appointed by the Herbert Smith Freehills global council – the firm's governance body – and then put to partner ratification before the end of the year. It is understood that a 50% partner majority will be needed for the vote to pass.
The firm reported post-merger revenues of £471.2m for the seven months from October 2012 to April this year.
The seven-month figure extrapolated over 12 months equates to a 12-month total of just over £800m, meaning the revenues are broadly flat on the combined total of legacy Herbert Smith's 2011-12 turnover and Australia's Freehills' 2011 income.
Meanwhile, profits per equity partner (PEP) have fallen by around £100,000, down from £840,000 to £744,000 – a drop of 11%. The firm attributed the fall in PEP to the merger.
Herbert Smith Freehills declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEY Law Launches in Portugal, Targets 40 Lawyers by End of 2025
International Law Firm of the Year: A Q&A with Sidley Austin's London Managing Partner
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 2Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 3Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 4Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 5Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250