Lawyers on Demand project management service may answer BLP's outsourcing conundrum
Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) is mulling the use of a new legal project management service being piloted by Lawyers on Demand (LoD) as an alternative to launching its own outsourced process centre. LoD – BLP's flexible working business – is launching a trial of a new service that will see it provide full teams of lawyers to take over the routine work on larger projects, with LoD acting as the project manager. The LoD service currently provides individual lawyers to clients either on a secondment basis or a pay-as-you-go service dubbed LoD On Call, giving clients access to legal help remotely to manage surges in workload.
September 26, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Firm to pilot service that sees LoD teams take over routine work on larger projects
Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) is mulling the use of a new legal project management service being piloted by Lawyers on Demand (LoD) as an alternative to launching its own outsourced process centre.
LoD – BLP's flexible working business – is launching a trial of a new service that will see it provide full teams of lawyers to take over the routine work on larger projects, with LoD acting as the project manager.
The LoD service currently provides individual lawyers to clients either on a secondment basis or a pay-as-you-go service dubbed LoD On Call, giving clients access to legal help remotely to manage surges in workload.
BLP partners have suggested that, pending the successful conclusion of the pilot, the new project management service would be adopted as as an alternative to setting up a separate legal process outsourcing centre – an option the firm has been contemplating.
One partner at the firm said: "It would make much more sense for us to take advantage of the resources we already have in LoD – which has no overhead costs – rather than set up our own low-cost centre, which is incredibly expensive.
"By introducing a new division to the business it would act as a virtual low-cost centre with the lawyers continuing to work as they already do."
LoD is planning to offer the new service, initially using its existing 120 lawyers, to its current clients, which include BLP as well as other law firms and in-house teams.
BLP managing partner Neville Eisenberg said: "We have not yet taken any decisions and can't predict when the firm might use LoD's new managed service. We expect it will be piloted over the next few months with a view to assessing it before taking any final decisions."
Simon Harper, co-founder of LoD, said: "In trialling our On Call model we did a number of assignments that involved multiple LoD lawyers. We recognised that a layer of project management from LoD would be helpful to manage cost and workflow – our discussions are effectively about building on that with a specific client service line for this sort of work."
Last week LoD announced it had hired BLP's former HR director, Geoff Griffin, to help advise on its new law firm strategy, and had been attracting more senior, partner-level lawyers into the team. Griffin's appointment follows the hire of former Financial Times GC Tim Bratton, who joined LoD as practice development director in September.
LoD posted turnover of £9m for the 2012-13 financial year, following strong growth since its 2007 launch.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
- 1'David and Goliath' Dispute Between Software Developers Ends in $24M Settlement
- 2Supreme Court Takes Up the Corporate Transparency Act: Recent Litigation and Potential Next Steps
- 3Brogdon: The Final Nail in Corbin’s Coffin in Premises Cases
- 4What to Know About the New 'Overlapping Directorship' Antitrust Development
- 5'Quiet, Appropriate End:' NY Court of Appeals Formally Removes Erin Gall From Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250