Legal risk moves up boardroom agenda amid increasing pressure from regulators
There has been a sharp increase in how often regulatory and legal risk is discussed at board meetings, with 43% of companies discussing the subject at every meeting, up from 23% in 2012, according to the latest Legal Week Intelligence Corporate Risk Benchmarker, published in association with Deloitte. Risk was an 'infrequent' discussion at just 18% of companies. Legal risk was a board issue for 70% of companies with mid-sized turnover (£500m to £1bn) and least commonly discussed at board level at companies with a turnover of £1bn to £5bn (25%). "If there is an increasing compliance workload and an increase in board attention in some companies, it is perhaps because regulators and the authorities have been trending towards higher fines and more aggressive investigations," said Robert Cummins, assistant general counsel at satellite communications company Intelsat (pictured). "The bottom line is that the regulators are getting better at making the management feel the heat."
September 26, 2013 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
There has been a sharp increase in how often regulatory and legal risk is discussed at board meetings, with 43% of companies discussing the subject at every meeting, up from 23% in 2012, according to the latest Legal Week Intelligence Corporate Risk Benchmarker, published in association with Deloitte. Risk was an 'infrequent' discussion at just 18% of companies.
Legal risk was a board issue for 70% of companies with mid-sized turnover (£500m to £1bn) and least commonly discussed at board level at companies with a turnover of £1bn to £5bn (25%).
"If there is an increasing compliance workload and an increase in board attention in some companies, it is perhaps because regulators and the authorities have been trending towards higher fines and more aggressive investigations," said Robert Cummins, assistant general counsel at satellite communications company Intelsat (pictured). "The bottom line is that the regulators are getting better at making the management feel the heat."
The areas with the most significant focus for legal and compliance functions were data privacy and security (79%), bribery and corruption (73%) and leaks of confidential/price-sensitive information (56%).
Compliance is becoming a more expensive business, with 44% of respondents saying they had spent more on their compliance programmes over the past 12 months, compared to 36% spending the same and just 3% that had spent less.
Compliance spend is expected to increase over the next 12 months, driven by new laws and regulations (67%), increased activity by regulatory authorities (65%) and increased focus on regulatory risk and ethical conduct by the board (61%).
The research also found organisational complexity is the most pressing obstacle for effective compliance, followed by lack of resources.
There has been a decline of 10% in respondents citing growth in emerging markets as a reason for increased legal and compliance workload.
Julia Chain, managing director of Huron Legal, said: "Generally, we are living in an era of increasing regulation, where there are always new rules and firms are constantly questioning what regulation is going to come next."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
- 2Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 3Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 4People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 5How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250