HSF partners reject lockstep overhaul plans as CEO candidates emerge
Herbert Smith Freehills partners have voted to reject all four proposals for the firm's new unified remuneration system, potentially damaging plans to overhaul its rigid pre-merger structure. Partners will now be presented with a final alternative option, including elements of the four original proposals, which they will vote on in the coming weeks.
October 03, 2013 at 09:09 AM
3 minute read
Herbert Smith Freehills partners have voted to reject all four proposals for the firm's new unified remuneration system, potentially damaging plans to overhaul its rigid pre-merger structure.
Partners will now be presented with a final alternative option, including elements of the four original proposals, which they will vote on in the coming weeks.
The news comes as HSF begins its search for new leadership, with a number of candidates emerging in the race to replace current joint chief executives David Willis and Gavin Bell.
Following last year's merger, it was thought that the firm's remuneration would become closer aligned to legacy Freehills' flexible, more merit-based lockstep. But in a recent vote, each one of four restructured models was rejected by partners.
One of the options that was voted down is understood to have been a very similar model to Freehills' former structure, which involved a heavily modified lockstep running from 40 to 120 points.
HSF currently operates a pure eight-year lockstep for equity partners running from 43 to 100 points. It is understood that the new lockstep will run within a similar point bracket.
The final proposal that has been drafted up features a managed lockstep enabling partners to be held back or moved up at certain intervals. Gateways have been removed at the senior level of the lockstep. The difference between the top and bottom of the equity will also be increased, along with the firm's bonus pool for partners.
One HSF partner said: "The new system will ensure consistency across the firm. It's not about just adopting the Freehills system which is what people presumed would happen but you need to create a competitive environment. There are people who are against change- you need to be able to adapt in the current climate."
The new structure, if voted through, is expected to take effect from 1 May 2014. It will also include a 'balanced scorecard' which takes into account partners' financial performance and business development, as well as other factors, after the firm's management agreed to introduce a merit-based element to partners' pay last week.
The process of appointing a new leadership team at HSF is also now underway, with Willis and Bell set to retire from the firm in April 2014.
It is understood that global head of corporate Patrick Mitchell, London managing partner Ian Cox, managing partner EMEA Allen Hanen and global head of dispute resolution Sonya Leydecker have expressed an interest in the role.
The Herbert Smith Freehills Global Council – the firm's governance body – will decide whether the dual role will be replaced by a single CEO or whether it will continue to be undertaken jointly. The appointment process is expected to be completed by the end of the year.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Trending Stories
- 1How Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
- 2Jury Awards $1.25M to Police Officer Who Claimed Sexual Harassment
- 3Lawyer as Whistleblower? Associate Sues Firm
- 4New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
- 5Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250