Eight in 10 executives doubt their company's ability to handle legal risk
Eighty percent of company executives have little or no confidence in their organisation's ability to manage emerging legal risks, according to a new survey of senior business figures. The finding is one of a number of results drawn from a survey of CEOs, senior in-house lawyers and compliance professionals carried out by Berwin Leighton Paisner, which aimed to shed light on how companies are addressing the issue of legal risk – defined by the report as 'the legal aspects of operational risk'.
October 17, 2013 at 07:40 AM
3 minute read
Eighty percent of company executives have little or no confidence in their organisation's ability to manage emerging legal risks, according to a new survey of senior business figures.
The finding is one of a number of results drawn from a survey of CEOs, senior in-house lawyers and compliance professionals carried out by Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP), which aimed to shed light on how companies are addressing the issue of legal risk – defined by the report as 'the legal aspects of operational risk'.
Just two out of 10 respondents to the survey were confident in the ability of their business to identify and mitigate against emerging legal risks, with 44% expressing reservations and a further 20% stating they were not confident in their organisation's ability to tackle 'unknown unknowns'.
The report, which cites the payment protection insurance and swaps mis-selling scandals as examples of legal risk failures with multibillion-pound consequences, also found 80% of respondents agreed that material legal risks are likely to arise from their organisation's day-to-day business activities, with legislation and regulatory issues the number one concern, ahead of contractual issues and litigation.
PricewaterhouseCoopers head of global legal services transformation Stephen Allen commented: "The potential impact of business risks that result from law and regulation are largely misunderstood. Losses are often written off as 'operational failings' because they materialise outside of the legal team. And the importance and underlying reasons for such losses are often missed.
"With greater knowledge and focused management, many organisations can greatly reduce the impact of these risks."
The survey, which drew on the input of executives around the world working in 11 sectors including banking, insurance, manufacturing, energy and utilities, found that 60% of all respondents said they had a clear understanding of legal risk, including just 50% of risk and compliance professionals and only one quarter of CEOs/director-level professionals.
BLP legal risk consultancy head Matthew Whalley (pictured) said: "Little work has been done to help executives understand the concept of legal risk – it has been classed simply as 'something that lawyers deal with'."
"In-house legal departments need to understand these issues better, and go out into the business to identify where they are likely to occur. Business decisions are being taken without a full picture of the risks involved – and by the time issues reach the dispute stage, it's too late."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSlaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Trending Stories
- 1'True Leadership Is About Putting Others First': 2024 In-House Award Winners Inspired, Took Road Less Traveled
- 2A Q&A with Sidley Austin's London Leader
- 3New York-Based Harris Beach Combines With Connecticut-Based Murtha Cullina, Forming NE Powerhouse
- 4New Year, New Am Law 100: Challenges Await These Newly Merged Law Firms
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250