In-house lawyers still unsure how upcoming EU patent changes will impact on IP litigation
Many in-house legal teams are still unclear about how they will be affected by next year's overhaul of the European patents system. Research from Legal Week Intelligence in association with Powell Gilbert found that more than one in three lawyers involved in commissioning or carrying out IP work don't know enough about the introduction of the European Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court to say how it will change IP litigation. The new structure, which is due to be introduced in spring 2014, will involve the creation of unitary European patents, enforceable across all 28 EU states. The proposed Unified Patent Court would hear infringement cases from across all member states.
October 24, 2013 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Many in-house legal teams are still unclear about how they will be affected by next year's overhaul of the European patents system.
Research from Legal Week Intelligence in association with Powell Gilbert found that more than one in three lawyers involved in commissioning or carrying out IP work don't know enough about the introduction of the European Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court to say how it will change IP litigation.
The new structure, which is due to be introduced in spring 2014, will involve the creation of unitary European patents, enforceable across all 28 EU states. The proposed Unified Patent Court would hear infringement cases from across all member states.
More than half of respondents to the survey, three quarters of whom work in-house and a quarter in private practice, said they didn't know if the changes would have an impact on the cost of obtaining patents. Some 19% thought costs would increase, with 16% saying they would be lower.
"The aim of the new system is to deliver a more effective and cheaper patent, and one that can be litigated across Europe," said Penny Gilbert, a partner at Powell Gilbert (pictured). "But one of the big unknowns now is what the costs of the system will be."
Most of those surveyed welcomed the new system, with 58% rating it as a 'good idea' and only 3% saying it was a 'bad idea'. However, of these positive responses, more than half said they were not sure the system would work well in practice.
Among the other findings from the wide-ranging survey was that IP lawyers view China as causing the most concern when it came to the protection of IP rights, with 58% naming the country as providing the biggest challenge. Europe trailed in second with 17%, while 12% said India provided the greatest challenge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/392/2023/10/AdobeStock_627004176_Editorial_Use_Only-767x633.jpg)
German Court Orders X to Release Data Amid Election Interference Concerns
![De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9e/5e/11bbd7bf41a0a31b0d0609e2c76f/sven-dumoulin-new-chief-legal-officer-cofra-holding-767x633.jpg)
De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise
![Hengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE Hengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/05/Energy-source-767x633.jpg)
Hengeler Advises On €7B Baltica 2 Wind Farm Deal Between Ørsted and PGE
2 minute read![DLA Piper Partner to Head Up Two New Dentons Practices in Brussels DLA Piper Partner to Head Up Two New Dentons Practices in Brussels](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bb/11/7a03243b414fb49eb650989249eb/vos-debievre-767x633-1.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Orrick Picks Up 13-Lawyer Tech, VC Group From Gunderson Dettmer
- 2How Alzheimer’s and Other Cognitive Diseases Affect Guardianship, POAs and Estate Planning
- 3How Lower Courts Are Interpreting Justices' Decision in 'Muldrow v. City of St. Louis'
- 4Phantom Income/Retained Earnings and the Potential for Inflated Support
- 5Should a Financially Dependent Child Who Rejects One Parent Still Be Emancipated?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250