Hong Kong to give green light to LLP structures next year
Law firms practising in Hong Kong could be permitted to establish limited liability partnerships (LLPs) from next year under new rules being drawn up by the Law Society of Hong Kong. A law bringing local liability regulations in line with international frameworks is expected to come into force in the next 12 months after additional legislation is approved by Hong Kong's Legislative Council (Legco), the city's solicitor-general Frank Poon has indicated.
November 07, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
International firms permitted to expand limited liability to HK
Law firms practising in Hong Kong could be permitted to establish limited liability partnerships (LLPs) from next year under new rules being drawn up by the Law Society of Hong Kong.
A law bringing local liability regulations in line with international frameworks is expected to come into force in the next 12 months after additional legislation is approved by Hong Kong's Legislative Council (Legco), the city's solicitor-general Frank Poon has indicated.
Approval of the additional rules would allow international firms to integrate their Hong Kong businesses with their broader LLP network, instead of ring-fencing their partnerships from their Hong Kong practices.
Senior lawyers have hailed the move as "long overdue" and making Hong Kong more "fit for purpose" for international firms.
The city's LLP regulations are governed by the Legal Practitioners Amendment Ordinance, which was introduced last July but has yet to be implemented and remains subject to subsidiary legislation being drafted by the city's Law Society.
"In the course of the next 12 months [the Law Society] will go before Legco to explain the rules," Poon said. "I'm hoping [it will become law soon] because I can see that there is interest in this development."
In Hong Kong, lawyers can only operate as sole proprietors or general partnerships with the latter imposing unlimited liability on partners.
Under the new LLP rules, firms will be required to top up their professional indemnity insurance from HK$10m (£805,000) to HK$20m (£1.6m), irrespective of their size.
The clawback period, or length of time partners will be required to pay back their profit share as compensation, has been limited to two years rather than the six originally proposed. Firms will also be required to name at least one supervising partner responsible for the matter in question.
Also expected to be brought into effect are laws allowing solicitors' corporations, which were passed in 1997 but never implemented. These would allow practising lawyers to work as company directors, but not be personally liable for any matter unless they held a relationship with the client.
Poon said the two models would hopefully lead to consolidation of the local industry and create more options for international firms.
Vincent Connor (pictured), Pinsent Masons' Hong Kong managing partner, commented: "In terms of making Hong Kong law for businesses consistent with other jurisdictions where they have a modern approach to this sort of structuring, then it makes sense and makes Hong Kong law more fit for purpose.
"It's not going to remove the need for care and caution, but it will provide consistency of structure. For that reason, it is attractive."
Michael Liu, the Hong Kong managing partner for Latham & Watkins, added: "I expect we will incorporate our HK practice as an LLP in Hong Kong. This is actually long overdue and a welcome development for lawyers here."
Related: Hong Kong lawyers remain vexed by LLP issue as sticking points linger over reform
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1Church of Scientology Set to Depose Phila. Attorney in Sexual Abuse Case
- 2An AG Just Specified How AI Could Get You in Hot Water
- 3Supreme Court Appears to Lean Toward Letting TikTok Ban Take Effect
- 4Standing Spat: Split 2nd Circuit Lets Challenge to Pfizer Diversity Program Proceed
- 5Judge Jablonski and Chief Justice Rabner Both Acted Completely Properly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250