Information overload: big data threatens business model of even the elite law firms
Law firms are increasingly turning to big data to extract more value from the thousands of briefs, memos, pleadings and legal records they produce every day, allowing them to develop a more joined-up approach between research, case workflow, pitch preparation and sales. But by changing the way they do business, law firms are also exposing themselves to a new set of threats and opportunities.
November 14, 2013 at 07:03 PM
6 minute read
Legal sector is ahead of the game on extracting value, but there are competitive risks over pricing
Law firms are increasingly turning to big data to extract more value from the thousands of briefs, memos, pleadings and legal records they produce every day, allowing them to develop a more joined-up approach between research, case workflow, pitch preparation and sales.
But by changing the way they do business, law firms are also exposing themselves to a new set of threats and opportunities.
Increasing efficiency could also mean fewer billable hours and lower law firm revenues. This, coupled with a traditional bias towards human intervention, might go some way to explaining why the sector as a whole has been reluctant to recognise it is ahead of the game compared to other industries in terms of how it uses data.
With this in mind, below are four ways in which big data is changing the legal sector as well as a warning on what this could mean for the future of the market. This includes the prospect of ever-intensifying competition as big data commoditises legal work and raises questions about the business models of even the biggest firms.
Algorithmic analysis
As part of the research phase on a case, the job of searching through precedents and evaluating findings to advise a client used to fall to junior associates and paralegals. Today, products from companies such as LexisNexis and Westlaw can automatically match relevant cases, helping firms predict case outcomes and develop tactics more efficiently based on large swathes of historic data.
Working processes are evolving rapidly, giving rise to products such as LexisNexis' MedMal Navigator, Verdict & Settlement Analyzer, or Lex Machina in the patent litigation arena. This automation of the more mundane but time-intensive tasks is changing the speed of operations and the expectations on costs to deliver work. Reducing the manpower element from this process could lead to fee pressure – a potential risk for firms.
Case preparation
Today, legal cases often require the sifting through and analysing of thousands of terabytes of data to extract pertinent information. E-Discovery software can automate the process so that expensive and highly-trained lawyers can focus on analysing and interpreting a pre-sifted version of the data rather than raw information. This is challenging the traditional leverage model and the role of the associate and paralegal.
According to recent OC&C research, the e-Discovery market is already worth an estimated $1bn (£623m). Typically, the discovery phase of a case is estimated at about 15% to 20% of litigation costs, so the size of the prize for companies to reduce costs is significant. In a world where more and more cases involve vast swathes of information, this practice is becoming ever more important in developing case strategy and tactics.
Comms revolution
Products are being launched that provide live updates from courtrooms, while also converting the information into a searchable database which can be analysed and used to drive decision-making. Businesses such as M-Lex or Mergermarket's PAR are examples of services answering this demand for 'information at speed' – particularly on topics such as competition law.
These developments create another challenge for law firms: human capital. New expertise is required, including staff who can innovate and take advantage of the new tools. Re-skilling and reviewing working practices is critical.
New business
Big data is creating new business streams for law firms. As clients look to leverage big data within their organisations, there is an increasing need for advice on its acceptable use and security given the significant reputational and financial risks associated with the misuse of datasets.
This is good for the industry, creating new demand for both data-literate lawyers and new legal practice areas that focus on how to apply and leverage data.
This has led to some interesting diversified service provision within the legal sector already. For example, US firm Bradford & Barthel has launched a specialist consultancy called Spherical Models to support clients' big data plans.
However, even though many law firms are starting to develop their data-related experience for clients, the knowledge and expertise to do so remains fairly limited across the legal profession as a whole.
Big challenge
Big data is opening up huge opportunities for the legal sector – but it is also raising a number of new challenges. While many firms are beginning to experiment with some of the new tools that are coming to market, there remains a substantial amount of manual work and analysis across the industry. There remains a degree of scepticism that algorithms and data can arrive at the same conclusions as a bright young lawyer.
But in the long term, these tools will increase competition in the legal market. Individual expertise will become less relevant in a world where big data can commoditise legal work and level the playing field.
Large teams are a key differentiator for magic circle firms today, but the increased adoption of smart tools will reduce their competitive advantage as the scale of teams required to carry out the work will be reduced.
Many forms of legal work could become commoditised as the tools used will broadly be available to all. This raises some critical questions for law firms in terms of how they should think about differentiation and developing their offerings to protect their market positions.
While neither will happen overnight, firms are likely to go one of two ways: they will either use more junior staff to sift through the high volumes of data and decrease their number of highly-paid lawyers; or they will automate some of the more manual tasks, reducing headcount and focusing their recruitment on senior staff.
Inevitably, these developments will lead to continued competitive pricing between law firms, and those who do not adapt and embrace big data will quickly find themselves at a disadvantage. With most to lose, the leaders of today won't necessarily be the leaders tomorrow.
Fergus Jarvis is a partner at OC&C Strategy Consultants.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
X-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
Trending Stories
- 1LexisNexis Announces Public Availability of Personalized AI Assistant Protégé
- 2Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 3Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 4The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 5Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250