Trainee retention rates at UK top 10's HK bases remain high as firms continue to invest in Asia
Trainee retention rates at the Hong Kong offices of the UK's top 10 law firms have remained broadly static on last year as firms continue to invest in Asian markets, despite a comparatively uncertain year for the local economy. Ninety percent (55 out of 62) of newly qualified lawyers (NQs) at the UK's top firms in Hong Kong were offered jobs this September, all of whom accepted, according to research by Legal Week.
November 14, 2013 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Ninety percent of newly qualified lawyers offered jobs as retention rates in Asia surpass London intakes
Trainee retention rates at the Hong Kong offices of the UK's top 10 law firms have remained broadly static on last year as firms continue to invest in Asian markets, despite a comparatively uncertain year for the local economy.
Ninety percent (55 out of 62) of newly qualified lawyers (NQs) at the UK's top firms in Hong Kong were offered jobs this September, all of whom accepted, according to research by Legal Week.
This compares to last year's figure of 94% when 58 out of 63 NQs were offered roles, with 55 accepting.
Clifford Chance (CC), Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Slaughter and May, Linklaters and Eversheds all retained their entire NQ round in Hong Kong this year, while Allen & Overy (A&O), Herbert Smith Freehills and DLA Piper each kept on more than 80%.
A&O, Hogan Lovells, Norton Rose Fulbright and DLA Piper saw slight dips in retention rates on last years' values; however, broadly retention rates in Asia are higher this year than across the larger London intakes.
Lak Purewal, head of HR at Norton Rose Fulbright, said: "The key difference is in the number of trainees that are recruited. Fewer slots may be available for specific areas, and where you have a lot
of competition, especially in the current economic climate, some trainees may drop off if they haven't met the quality standard."
Firms' continued investment in Asia is apparent from the rise in graduate recruitment, which has grown 8% from 2012 to 2013. The top 10 firms took on 77 lawyers for training contracts this year compared to 71 last year. This figure stood at 62 in 2011.
The firm that saw the biggest jump in new trainees was CC, taking on 10 this year compared with just six in 2012. Seven out of the 10 firms offered more training contracts in Hong Kong this year than they did last year, with only Hogan Lovells, Linklaters and A&O reducing the number.
"Firms in Hong Kong are slightly more confident this year," said King Tak Fung, Eversheds' Hong Kong recruitment partner.
"Generally, most of the law firms are busy. There is also a time lag of at least two years, so people can hardly project the economy of two years later, so they will try and be a little bit optimistic about manpower provisions."
Sushma Sharma, Postgraduate Certificate in Law programme leader at City University of Hong Kong, said it remained difficult for Hong Kong graduates to secure training contracts at law firms despite rising numbers at the top UK outfits.
"It is harder than it was two or three years ago," she said. "The numbers in the bigger firms may have slightly gone up because the market in Hong Kong has been a little better than what's happening in the UK, and so they're focusing on here more, but they take only a small percentage of the total graduates in Hong Kong."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250