Trust the experts – mitigating the risks and the perils of wealth transfer in Asia
In recent years, there has been a surge in offshore litigation surrounding the transfer of wealth in Asia. Cases have arisen partly because of problems with the legacy trust structures set up in the 1980s and 1990s in jurisdictions such as the British Virgin Islands (BVI), and partly because of the global economic climate, which has exacerbated the fury of the beneficiaries of these trust funds, many of which have plummeted in value.
November 14, 2013 at 07:06 PM
4 minute read
At Legal Week's Private Client Forum Hong Kong, a panel of senior experts explained the risks of not having robust trust structures and the problem with entrepreneurs' perceived immortality, writes Elizabeth Broomhall
In recent years, there has been a surge in offshore litigation surrounding the transfer of wealth in Asia. Cases have arisen partly because of problems with the legacy trust structures set up in the 1980s and 1990s in jurisdictions such as the British Virgin Islands (BVI), and partly because of the global economic climate, which has exacerbated the fury of the beneficiaries of these trust funds, many of which have plummeted in value.
Indeed, many clients have become more aware of the litigation and protection options available to them.
Experts say it has become more important than ever to structure trusts correctly at the point of creation, and to have sensitive conversations with settlors which would mitigate future problems. They say the choice governing law is also important, as is the need to balance trustee and settlor control of the trust.
At Legal Week's second annual Private Client Forum in Hong Kong in September, Bill Ahern, founder of Family Capital Conservation, chaired the debate on the issue.
Alan Binnington (pictured), director for private client at RBC Wealth Management, believes much of the issues he sees are caused by previous advice and structures.
"The conversations that we have are heavily influenced by that legacy experience. We'll either be talking to people about restructuring – which will be getting rid of the cheap and cheerful BVI company which people thought was a solution to absolutely every problem – or we'll be talking about new structuring where you're dealing with new wealth.
"But there is still that legacy experience. We see it firstly in the desire for settlor control as they were used to that in the simple company structure. They want to replicate it. They've seen that many offshore jurisdictions and indeed Hong Kong now allow settlor reserved powers. They see the list of powers that can be reserved and they want all of them."
Another area influenced by the legacy experience is compliance. According to Binnington, in the past the most clients were asked for was a passport and two utility bills, but, in today's more complicated society, a lot more questions are asked.
He added: "In this jurisdiction, privacy and confidentiality are important. The clients may not even have given their advisers the full picture of the family wealth and yet we have to ask the questions about family funds and the source of the wealth. That can often be a very difficult conversation for someone who was used to having not to disclose information."
Another key issue in the Asian market, which is seeing burgeoning numbers of rich young entrepreneurs, is succession planning after death. "The problem is that most settlors regard themselves as immortal and they don't want to have that discussion," Binnington said. "They'll focus on what they're going to do and the powers that they're going to exercise, but they really do need to think about succession.
"One of the difficulties is say if your client is a young entrepreneur, they've built up a very substantial business – perhaps it's been listed – and there may not be any members of the immediate family who are ready to step into his shoes because he's probably just got a wife and two young children.
"So again, you have to look at governance issues, whether you should bring in a trusted adviser, perhaps an immediate successor, depending on when the event happened."
Andrew De La Rosa, from International Chancery & Trusts Chambers, added: "I'm convinced that in the mid-1980s and mid-1990s a lot of trusts were set up without any significant discussion of just these sorts of issues. 'It was tax-driven,' so the settlor says, 'the family constitution was ingrained in the culture, we don't need that, so we'll just set it up and it'll run itself and I'll be around forever'.
"It is only recently we started talking about sophisticated issues such as what happens when you are no longer on the scene. The advent and use of private trust companies has provided some answers to some of these issues, but I don't think it's a comprehensive answer to everything."
- Related event: Legal Week Private Client Forum Americas 2014
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250