RPC moves to merit-based pay for newly qualified lawyers
RPC is to abolish the traditional flat rate salary for newly qualified lawyers (NQs) in favour of a merit-based salary band. The change comes into effect from September 2014 and will result in a slight reduction of the current NQ rate, which has stood at £58,000 in London and £44,000 in Bristol since 2010.
November 19, 2013 at 08:45 AM
2 minute read
RPC is to abolish the traditional flat rate salary for newly qualified lawyers (NQs) in favour of a merit-based salary band.
The change comes into effect from September 2014 and will result in a slight reduction of the current NQ rate, which has stood at £58,000 in London and £44,000 in Bristol since 2010.
However, the highest performing NQs will be able to earn above the upper rate of the magic circle firms, currently around £63,000, based on a range of criteria including overall performance, client relationships and contribution to the firm.
NQs, along with all other associates at the firm, will still be eligible for a bonus on top of their basic pay.
"The concept of the flat rate has passed its sell-by date and no longer has any integrity," said the firm's managing partner, Jonathan Watmough (pictured).
"It does not recognise the different merits of individual NQs nor does it recognise the market variances between the different branches of law into which they will qualify."
Watmough added that the move was an effort to take account of "the pressures clients are under to obtain value from their suppliers".
RPC abandoned the partner lockstep model over a decade ago, and introduced a merit-based career framework for associates in 2009, which seeks to reward higher-performing junior lawyers with earlier promotion and pay increases.
"This move isn't motivated by cost-cutting," added Watmough. "It just makes sense to us to reflect the merit-based approach in the rest of the firm – which is, after all, that used by most of our clients."
"More than ever, these days we live in a value economy, and we need to be able to demonstrate to our clients that we are offering them good value for money from all of our lawyers."
"NQ salaries were inflated in the boom years before Lehman Brothers collapsed but have so far been exempt from the recalibration felt across the profession.
"In response to client demands every progressive firm has, over the last five years, reviewed and challenged every aspect of its operations, looking to release value. NQ salaries cannot, and should not, escape this."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPartners from Baker McKenzie, DLA Piper and PwC Join New Firms in Australia
4 minute readIndia Firm Engaged as Volkswagen Sues Local Authorities Over $1.4B Tax Bill
De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise
Reed Smith Joins Saudi Legal Boom as UK and US Firms Race for Market Share
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Conversation Catalyst: Transforming Professional Advancement Through Strategic Dialogue
- 2Trump Taps McKinsey CLO Pierre Gentin for Commerce Department GC
- 3Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 4Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 5A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250