Davis Polk's City base tops client rankings for quality of advice
Davis Polk & Wardwell's drive to build an English law practice in London has been endorsed by its clients after they gave it the top ranking for legal advice in the annual Legal Week Intelligence Client Satisfaction Report. News that the Wall Street firm leads the field for quality of legal advice comes hard on the heels of its hiring of a fourth English law partner – Ashurst finance partner Nick Benham – and its launch of a London trainee scheme.
December 05, 2013 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
RPC and Ince join US firm in top three as 1,400 clients polled
Davis Polk & Wardwell's drive to build an English law practice in London has been endorsed by its clients after they gave it the top ranking for legal advice in the annual Legal Week Intelligence Client Satisfaction Report.
News that the Wall Street firm leads the field for quality of legal advice comes hard on the heels of its hiring of a fourth English law partner – Ashurst finance partner Nick Benham – and its launch of a London trainee scheme.
The firm beat RPC into second place, with Ince & Co securing the third-place slot.
The survey of about 1,400 in-house lawyers asked them to rate the quality of service they receive from their law firms across eight criteria. As well as legal advice this included quality of commercial advice, cost billing practices and service delivery.
In the all-important category of quality of legal advice – ranked by clients as the most important element of the service they receive – Davis Polk received a rating of 9.43 out of 10 compared to the average score for all the firms in the survey of 8.5. RPC scored 9.33 and Ince received a rating of 9.20. DWF (9.15) and Field Fisher Waterhouse (9.12) made up the rest of the top five.
The top 10 table of the highest ranking firms for quality of legal advice provides striking evidence that clients do not regard the largest and most profitable law firms as having a monopoly on the provision of the best advice.
Davis Polk's global managing partner Thomas Reid (pictured) said: "We are fully committed to the London practice of English law, so long as we hire people of the same calibre as the people we hire in New York. A rigid adherence to this principle is the simple ingredient to our success.
"Not only have we made a big push to be the highest quality advisers on any legal issue, but we have also tried to anticipate what the next legal questions from clients will be. Clients don't expect us to provide everything the magic circle firms provide, but they recognise the quality proposition in London."
With a score of 8.97, Slaughter and May is the highest-ranking magic circle firm for legal advice, coming ninth. Linklaters (8.90) and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (8.86) are virtually neck and neck in 12th and 13th places respectively.
The survey indicates that law firms have succeeded in maintaining the quality of their advice despite sustained pressure from clients to cut fees.
The average satisfaction level among clients for quality of legal advice edged up from 8.5 in 2012 to 8.52 in 2013, while satisfaction with the quality of commercial advice held steady at 8.0. However, satisfaction with cost and billing practices did slip, from 7.22 to 7.05.
"The key thing for all firms – regardless of size – is exceeding client expectation. To achieve this, you need highly motivated and focused lawyers and staff who understand the firm's values, place in the market and what it is best at doing," commented legal consultant Andrew Otterburn.
"Training does play a role in fostering client relationships, but leadership is far more important – not just from the top, but at all levels."
For more information on the Client Satisfaction Report contact Jeremy Hill on +44(0)2033715210.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGCs Responsible for Gender Balanced Boardrooms Under New EU Rules
A Dark Future of Deepfakes and Disobedient AI: What GCs Foresee For 2050
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Tech's Predictions for Legal Ops & In-House in 2025
- 2SDNY US Attorney Damian Williams Lands at Paul Weiss
- 3Litigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Norton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over Ethnicity Score System
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250