Western firms sceptical about short-term impact of China's latest economic reform
International law firms with offices in China have broadly welcomed the country's latest attempts at economic reform, but remain sceptical about their immediate impact on the legal industry. The plans, which were recently approved at the four-day third plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, set out a string of policy changes aimed at transforming China's economy.
December 05, 2013 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Partners say domestic changes are essential to unleash market forces, writes Elizabeth Broomhall
International law firms with offices in China have broadly welcomed the country's latest attempts at economic reform, but remain sceptical about their immediate impact on the legal industry.
The plans, which were recently approved at the four-day third plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, set out a string of policy changes aimed at transforming China's economy.
The Chinese Government says it wants to create a more Western-style, consumer-driven market and open up the country to new forms of investment in a bid to counter a worrying slowdown in economic growth. For Western law firms and other businesses, important initiatives include plans to boost private sector participation, relax restrictions on foreign investment into the country and steps to liberalise the market.
Most significantly, China is looking at ways to increase private sector access to capital and improve the management of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), while saying that it wants to end monopolies.
But despite this potential shift towards market liberalisation, law firm partners insist the reforms will have a limited impact on dealflow in and out of China in the near future. Some believe that the immediate impact is more likely to be felt by local practices.
"For English or New York lawyers, all we're interested in really is the cross-border work and the key point for that is continuing deregulation of capital controls," says Andrew Malcolm (pictured), head of Asia capital markets at Linklaters.
"Most of these reforms are concerned with reform of the domestic economy, and that isn't of itself going to throw off work of a cross-border nature."
That said, Malcolm does acknowledge that a knock-on effect from those domestic reforms could be a welcome boost to cross-border deals in the longer term. In addition, a handful of more far-reaching proposals, particularly those connected with opening up control of the SOEs, could incentivise outbound investment by private companies more quickly.
"China has continuously been reforming its capital account over the past three years, tied in with the internationalisation of the renminbi," Malcolm says.
"But that's going quite slowly [because] the domestic economy just isn't ready to release capital controls completely. So domestic economic reforms are essential to provide for full capital account convertibility in the future. The reform package also continues to commit to [some] capital account deregulation in the shorter term and I think that will generate more work.
"We'll see more Chinese companies being able to issue bonds in the offshore market… and generally more relaxation, so that Chinese companies will have a higher quota to make overseas investments and overseas M&A transactions will increase."
Alan Wang, an M&A partner at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer in Beijing, agrees that the outlook is generally positive, but is unlikely to spawn radical change in the near future, either to workload or the way in which mandates are won.
"It's not immediately obvious that it will have any direct impact on the legal industry, but you can see that the direction is towards allowing market forces to play a decisive role in regulating economic activity. As for the procurement of legal services, this is still a very small part of what an SOE actually does, so at what stage the [SOE] reform will trickle down to that is hard to say.
"But I would expect Chinese companies to adopt an approach that is more in line with international standards in terms of the procurement process. So they might select external lawyers based more on expertise, costs and other factors, and less subject to intervention by regulators."
With the reforms still in a nascent state, Simmons & Simmons Asia managing partner Paul Li says he is adopting a "wait and see" approach until more information is available.
"It's not immediately obvious that it's going to make a difference. We're waiting to see what the detail is. Saying the market economy is going to be a key driver is obviously a welcome statement. But without the substance of what that means in practice, it is difficult to say [how this will affect the market]."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250