Winston & Strawn eyes Taiwan, Singapore offices in Asia push
US law firm Winston & Strawn is eyeing new offices in Taiwan and Singapore as part of a wider Asia growth plan that will see it double in size in the region. The Chicago-headquartered outfit, which currently has three Asian bases located in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing which it inherited from now defunct Heller Ehrman five years ago, plans to grow its teams in IP, corporate, anti-trust, energy and disputes.
January 06, 2014 at 12:19 AM
4 minute read
US law firm Winston & Strawn is eyeing new offices in Taiwan and Singapore as part of a wider Asia growth plan that will see it double in size in the region.
The Chicago-headquartered outfit, which currently has three Asian bases located in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing which it inherited from now defunct Heller Ehrman five years ago, plans to grow its teams in IP, corporate, anti-trust, energy and disputes.
"It's been a tough five years for law firms but we've managed to hold our profitability," said the firm's regional managing partner, David Hall-Jones.
"The direction in Asia is definitely right. We're sticking to our strengths. We've more than doubled in size and tripled in revenues in the first five years.
"I could see us doubling in terms of both size and revenues in the next two years. We are looking to be in four jurisdictions in a five year timeline."
Under the plans, the firm will open an office in Taiwan in the first quarter of this year, with a focus on litigations filed in the US International Trade Commission (ITC).
The firm's existing capabilities in this area includes four partners and specialist ITC litigators – John Alison, Steve Anzalone, Paul Goulet and Tom Jarvis – who were hired in Washington DC along with six lawyers in July last year from IP firm Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner (Finnegan).
Alison is to head up the base, splitting his time between Taiwan and Washington, while the other partners will continue to commute from the US once a month.
"We anticipate opening in Taipei in March," said Hall-Jones. "Taiwan is the biggest market for our ITC practice – so our opening there is needs driven, one or more of the partners are there every month.
"We will have an office of three of four attorneys initially. Over time I think it will grow, as the same clients that need IP and ITC remedies have anti-trust and international arbitration needs as well."
Also on the cards is an office in Singapore to tap international arbitration, infrastructure and energy work.
Hall-Jones said the firm was looking to hire a team of partners instead of making individual appointments over time.
"I'm certainly interested in Singapore – we are keen to [launch] a regional infrastructure, energy and international arbitration practice – that would be opportunist if we had the right quality of practice," he said.
"Individual hires can work but our success as a firm has been team hires. If it was a five or six partner practice in Singapore, that would be fine. People who are successful together want to stay together. That would also give us an M&A capability as well."
Winston & Strawn has grown significantly in Asia in the last five years, with a number of additions in China, Hong Kong and the US.
Its most recent appointments include Clyde & Co labour and employment partner Matt Durham who joined the firm's Shanghai office in May last year, Baker & McKenzie US and Asia anti-trust partner Steve Harris who came on board in Washington in October, and Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe energy partner Marco Pocci who joined the firm in Hong Kong in December.
It now has a four-partner team in Hong Kong covering corporate, M&A, litigation and energy deals, and another four partner team in Shanghai doing inbound and outbound investment and employment work.
In Beijing the firm currently has no partners, but Hall-Jones said the plan is to add four lawyers in IP, disputes, energy and anti-trust over the next two years.
"Beijing is the harder one for us – there are relatively few firms that have large practices.
"We have looked at what can we do well and successfully, and for us that's going to be IP – so cross border patent litigation between China and the US, anti-trust, international arbitration and energy.
"We're aiming for four partners over a two year timeline for us to be as successful here as we have been in Shanghai."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIntel Secures Hard-Won Victory in Decades-Long Legal Wrangle With EU Regulator
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250