Asia-Pacific M&A soars to highest levels and value since 2001
Dealflow and value in Asia Pacific, excluding Japan, last year soared to its highest level since 2001, according to new data from Mergermarket.
January 17, 2014 at 06:25 AM
4 minute read
Dealflow and value in Asia-Pacific, excluding Japan, last year soared to record levels, according to new data from Mergermarket.
The region saw 2,577 deals announced in 2013 compared with 2,297 in 2012, marking a year-on-year rise of 12.2%.
The number of deals broke the previous record of 2,353 set before the global financial crisis in 2007.
The value of deals rose $403.4bn (£245.5bn) over the year, up 15% from 2012 when deals totalled $350.9bn (£213.6bn).
The market bucked the global trend in Q4 by being the only region to see increased deal value, registering a 41.8% uptick compared with the same period in 2012. The region also saw the highest increase in deal value from Q3, up 12.2%.
"General economic trends have been picking up, particularly in the second half of last year," said Linklaters Singapore-based M&A partner Will Kirschner. "Financing remains relatively cheap and many Asian companies have quite strong balance sheets. We have seen a lot of outbound interest, particularly from North Asia looking for opportunities in Southeast Asia across a variety of sectors."
The adviser rankings were topped by Herbert Smith Freehills by value and by King & Wood Mallesons (KWM) by volume, with the firm acting on 102 deals. KWM was also second in terms of value.
When looking at sectors, energy, mining and utilities M&A remained the most active during the year, with deals worth $93.9bn (£57.1bn), up 43.4% from a 2012 figure of $65.5bn (£39.7bn).
Real estate saw the biggest percentage increase in value and deal count, topping $36.7bn (£22.3bn) compared with $11.5bn (£7bn) in 2012 – a rise of 219.1% – alongside a 49.4% surge in volume from 81 deals in 2012 to 121 last year.
Looking at cross-border deals, Africa and the Middle East saw a significant amount of investment from Asia last year, with transactions into these markets worth $18.8bn (£11.4bn) against $7.1bn (£4.3bn) in 2012 – a 164.7% jump. The region therefore accounted for 23.4% of total outbound investment from Asia, up from 8.7% in 2012.
"Africa is increasingly becoming part of [the outbound M&A] story," added Kirschner. "The value of investment in Africa has obviously trailed investment into Asia and certain other parts of the world, so a few large deals can really move the needle there."
But despite an uptick in dealflow into the Middle East and Africa, overall outbound Asian investments saw a slight dip during the 12-month period. The total value was $80.2bn (£48.7bn), down 2.4% from 2012 when it was $82.2bn (£49.9bn). Inbound M&A meanwhile was up 3%, from $67.4bn (£40.9bn) to $69.4bn (£42.1bn).
"China deals in the last year have been a bit flat or have even dropped a little compared with the year before," said Alan Wang, a Beijing-based corporate partner from Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. "But it hasn't been as dramatic as people had thought. There were several reasons – one was the change of Government. Chinese SOEs took a wait-and-see approach to find out what the new policies would be before plunging into major deals. There was also some tightening on bank lending in China, which would have contributed to the drop in outbound M&A."
But Wang remains positive about the year ahead in view of the Chinese Government's commitment to outbound investment.
He also said that transactions in the consumer sector – which more than doubled in value in 2013 to reach $12.3bn (£7.5bn) – would lead to a substantial upturn in the next 12 months.
"I'm not sure the overall value will increase significantly but in terms of volume I think they will.
"Chinese consumer companies are trying to globalise. The Chinese consumer market, while expanding, is very competitive and the profit margins are low. So companies are being pressured to look abroad for additional markets and sources of revenue."
- Related briefing: Global M&A trends in Q4 2013 – a case of history not repeating itself
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Long Hours, Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
Singapore Leaders Stress the Importance of the Rule of Law Amid Geopolitical Tensions
Can Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit by New York Philharmonic Oboist Accused of Sexual Misconduct
- 2California Court Denies Apple's Motion to Strike Allegations in Gender Bias Class Action
- 3US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
- 4Kirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
- 5African Law Firm Investigated Over ‘AI-Generated’ Case References
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250