Dentons UK arm increased bank loans, suffered 10% profit drop in 2012-13
Dentons' UKMEA arm increased its bank borrowing by £3m in 2012-13, while partners' capital contributions fell by 53% to £2.8m in the same period.
January 21, 2014 at 10:01 AM
2 minute read
Dentons' UKMEA arm increased its bank borrowing by £3m in 2012-13, while partners' capital contributions fell by 53% to £2.8m in the same period.
Accounts filed with Companies' House also show revenue at Dentons UKMEA LLP – formerly SNR Denton UK LLP – dropped for the fourth year in a row to £142.8m, a year-on-year decrease of 1.5%.
Profit was also down, slipping by 10% to £28.3m. The firm blamed the profit dip to increased marketing and administration costs borne by its three-way combination with Salans and Fraser Milner Casgrain.
Dentons had previously declined to provide a geographical breakdown of performance. Last July it unveiled its first set of combined global financial figures in the wake of the three-way merger in March 2013. The firm reported combined revenues of £829.7m, placing it among the top 20 global law firms by total earnings.
Meanwhile, the accounts show a significant fall in headcount for the second year in a row, with fee earner numbers dropping from 471 to 435 and administrative and support staff numbers decreasing from 523 to 493.
This contributed to a non-partner personnel decrease of 7%, resulting in a 4% drop in staff costs to £72.8m.
The move is further evidence of the firm's efforts to strip out cost within the UKMEA business.
In 2011-12, fee earner headcount fell 9% against a saving of £7.1m for the UK LLP, while support staff numbers dropped by a similar proportion.
The member with the highest entitlement to profit stood at £564,000 in 2012-13, a 17% fall on the previous year's figure.
Despite the medium-term bank loan increase, and fall in members' capital contributions, bank loans and overdrafts due within one year did fall by £1.6m to £10.8m.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCanada’s Antitrust Watchdog Sues Google For Billions Over Ad Practices
3 minute readMorais Leitão Expands in Asia with Timor-Leste Partnership
Funder Behind Mastercard Case Says Settlement 'Struck Without Our Agreement'
Trending Stories
- 1Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 2Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
- 3Elon Musk Has a Lot More Than a 'Tornetta' Appeal to Resolve in Del. Court
- 4Litigation Funder Behind Mastercard Case Says Settlement 'Struck Without Our Agreement'
- 5FTC Reaches Settlements With Two Companies on Claims of Selling Sensitive Location Data
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250