Jun He launches new group to tap government mandates
Chinese law firm Jun He has established a five partner government procurement practice to deal with a wave of new legal work expected to come from China's central government. The Beijing headquartered outfit, which last year saw a revenue increase of 15%, has launched the new group to focus exclusively on tendering, research and business development associated with upcoming government mandates.
January 23, 2014 at 11:46 PM
3 minute read
Chinese law firm Jun He has established a five-partner government procurement practice to deal with a wave of new legal work expected to come from China's central government.
The Beijing headquartered outfit, which last year saw a revenue increase of 15%, has launched the new group to focus exclusively on tendering, research and business development associated with upcoming government mandates.
"Now the Chinese government at a central level will procure legal services; use and pay external lawyers," managing partner of the firm David Liu told Legal Week.
"In China the government has only just started to do this. Before their legal department helped them but they didn't have their penal firm database and didn't spend much money on legal services."
"So we think it is useful to study, follow up and do marketing. All the main departments in the central government are starting to look into this or will look into this, we believe."
An example of the Chinese government starting to procure legal services was the move by the Ministry of Commerce (Mofcom) in October last year to establish its first legal panel of external law firms.
It selected 20 international outfit and 16 local firms as its preferred legal service providers, appointing one group to advise on economic and trade agreements, negotiations related to investment and international investment dispute cases, and a separate group to provide counsel on WTO and regional trade agreements, and on cross border dispute resolution.
Jun He was among the domestic firms which won spots on both sub-panels.
Liu said a dedicated procurement group – made up of existing Jun He partners who understand the relevant challenges and specific ways of government working – was key in order to successfully liaise with the client.
"It's not only a matter of legal expertise but also a cultural issue. They need the skills to deal with the government. They need to know the government processes.
"This is not a traditional practice group – it is a combination of business development, research and practice. They will focus more on this, and when necessary they will work together with other corporate partners or litigation partners or whatever required by the government."
He added: "Now it is just a small group of five partners. It's hard to say how many partners we will need. This has only just started, so we're trying it."
Jun He currently has nine offices, three of which are international, in addition to more than 350 lawyers – with approximately 150 partners or counsels.
In addition to the government group, the firm launched a further seven new practices last year, including pharmaceuticals, bankruptcy and restructuring, environment, compliance, private equity, Chinese outbound investment, and entertainment media and sport.
The firm has so far made clear its intention to remain independent and among the smaller of the Chinese firms, focusing on high end work in major Chinese cities and on international work in collaboration with its network of 'best friend' firms around the world.
However, Liu said he was keen to focus on building up talent in the coming year, with a focus on areas such as IP, outbound investment and anti-trust, as well as international capability.
Related: China's Ministry of Commerce selects 20 firms for two legal panels.
- Related event: Legal Week Corporate Counsel Forum Hong Kong 2014
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250