LLP filings show Freshfields revenue up less than reported in unaudited accounts
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer increased revenue by 4.4% last year, but the figure was some way down on that reported by the firm last summer.
January 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM
2 minute read
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer increased revenue by 4.4% last year, but the figure was some way down on that reported by the firm last summer.
According to LLP accounts filed with Companies House, the firm's revenue climbed from £1.177bn in 2011-12. The rise is significantly smaller than the 7.2% revenue hike reported by the firm last July. The firm said this was down to foreign exchange adjustments and a difference in unbilled revenue, which is not accounted in management accounts.
Similarly, the profit figures listed in the accounts are significantly lower than the management accounts reported by Freshfields last summer.
In July, the firm said net profit had increased 2% to £548m, while the accounts recently filed on Companies House show profit available for discretionary division amongst members stood at £312m, a 5% fall, year on year.
Freshfields explained the discrepancy by stating that remuneration of most partners outside the LLP – including Italy, the US, Moscow and Asia – are included in the audited accounts as an expense within staff costs, which grew 5% last year to £554m.
The profits figure was also impacted by partner retirement provisions, which are entirely dependent on future profits. These provisions increased "significantly" in 2012-13, according to the accounts, jumping 15% from £929.7m to £1.07bn within the financial year.
While the firm managed to increase revenue and profit, the average number of partners in Freshfields' LLP fell by 5% according to the filing
Last year, partner numbers decreased from 350 to 332, while there was a marginal increase in overall staff headcount from 4,476 to 4,561.
The partner with the highest remuneration and profit – including retirement payments – stood at £2.5m, a fall from the previous year's figure of £2.9m.
As reported by Legal Week last summer, the revenue jump in 2012-13 put Freshfields ahead of its magic circle peers Allen & Overy and Linklaters. The further increase in audited revenue means the firm is just £42m behind Clifford Chance, the highest revenue-generator of the group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCanada’s Antitrust Watchdog Sues Google For Billions Over Ad Practices
3 minute readMorais Leitão Expands in Asia with Timor-Leste Partnership
Funder Behind Mastercard Case Says Settlement 'Struck Without Our Agreement'
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyers Can Live Worthy of the Calling They Have Received and The Gifts With Which They Have Been Blessed
- 2Did Static Case Management Mortally Injure Our Democracy?
- 3'This Trend Isn't Over': Law Firm Partner De-Equitizations Expected to Continue
- 4Attorney-Client Privilege: Recent Informative Decisions
- 5Here We Go Again: Trump and the Coming Civil Rights Storm
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250