Herbies ups bank borrowing as first post-merger LLPs show small revenue drop
Herbert Smith Freehills'(HSF's) bank borrowings grew by 38% for 2012-13, as the firm's UK fee income dipped by 1.6%.
January 24, 2014 at 06:21 AM
2 minute read
Herbert Smith Freehills' (HSF's) bank borrowings grew by 38% for 2012-13, as the firm's UK fee income dipped by 1.6%.
The firm's latest limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts, the first to be filed since legacy Herbert Smith and Australia's Freehills merged in 2012, show that total bank borrowings increased by more than £30m, rising from £80.2m to £110.7m
Meanwhile HSF more than doubled its bank overdraft, with the facility growing from £26m to £62.7m during the year.
A spokesperson for the firm said: "Our debt levels are in line with the operations of a firm which following our October 2012 merger is nearly twice the size of legacy Herbert Smith and in a period of significant investment including a range of integration projects, and expansion focused on our new offices in New York, Seoul, Frankfurt and Berlin.
"They are structured to meet our requirements over a number of years and are consistent with what we would expect at this point in our trading and investment cycle."
The report, which does not account for the Australian business, shows that legacy Herbert Smith brought in fee income of £366.8m, down by 1.6% on the previous year when it made £372.8m.
Operating profit increased to £107.7m from £101.8m, with profit available for division among the firm's members rising by 103% from £10.99m to £22.4m.
Meanwhile, the top earner at the firm took home £2m during the year, compared with £1.6m in 2011-12.
The average number of fee earners grew 9.6% from 228 to 250, while overall staff headcount increasing by 8% to 372. The figures accompany a slight drop of 1.6% in average member numbers, which fell to 185.
Last June, the firm disclosed combined post-merger revenue of £471.2m for the seven months leading from October 2012 to April 2013.
The firm's partnership last month approved a new pay structure for the combined business, which will come into effect at the start of the next financial year. It will operate a single managed lockstep that will run from 43 to 100 points.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250