Eversheds LLPs reveal restructuring costs of £4.8m during 2012-13
Eversheds has spent £4.8m on restructuring costs during 2012-13 after a strategic review that led to 116 job cuts last year.
January 27, 2014 at 10:45 AM
2 minute read
Eversheds spent £4.8m on restructuring costs during 2012-13 after a strategic review that led to 116 job cuts last year.
The firm's latest limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts, filed with Companies House, show that the firm incurred £4.8m in restructuring costs after concluding its redundancy consultation.
The consultation, which originally put 166 jobs at risk, also led to the closure of the firm's 29-strong Copenhagen office.
In the filing, the firm stated: "Restructuring costs were incurred following a detailed management and operational review in January 2013 to align the operations of the firm to the new strategic three-year plan and address certain parts of the business where current market activity makes existing structures unsustainable."
The accounts also show that the firm incurred £3.7m in costs for leases on vacant or sublet properties.
The group's operating profit, including its share of joint ventures, rose 4% to £117.9m from £113.3m. However profit before finance charges dropped from £113.6m to £109.4m.
The report shows that the firm's UK offices increased their contribution by 2.5% from £327m of total revenue to £335.9m, to account for nearly 90% of the global total.
At the end of the financial year the firm reported worldwide turnover of £376m, up 2.7% on the previous year when it stood at £366m, while profit per equity partner rose from £632,000 to £642,000.
The firm's Asia operations grew the most, posting a 6.8% rise in contribution to £20m, or 5.3% of total turnover. The European outposts brought in £20.4m, which made up the remaining 5.4% of the business.
The highest paid member of the firm took home £1.22m, 5.1% up on the previous year when they pocketed an equivalent of £1.16m.
The firm's wage and salary costs grew 1.9% from £112.6m to £114.7m, against a decrease in average fee earner headcount from 1,482 to 1,455 and dip in support staff numbers from 986 to 974. The average number of members grew to 305 from 293.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250