Wragges outlines plans to adapt pay model for incoming LG partners
Wragge & Co is firming up plans to shift Lawrence Graham (LG) partners into an all-equity structure, with the firm set to vote in members of a new remuneration committee to oversee the transition.
January 28, 2014 at 10:09 AM
3 minute read
Wragge & Co is firming up plans to shift Lawrence Graham (LG) partners into an all-equity structure, with the firm set to vote in members of a new remuneration committee to oversee the transition.
The firms are set to formally merge on 1 May, creating a £171m firm named Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co.
The two partnerships will elect a team of around five partners, drawn from both firms, to sit on a remuneration committee over the coming months.
The committee will assess how to allocate profits to LG's 35 non-equity partners and whether they should be made up to equity status when they join Wragges.
Wragges senior partner Quentin Poole (pictured) said: "It is not practical to expect all fixed share partners to join the equity from the start, so the committee will be looking at exactly how the practice will evolve from fixed share to floating share."
The firm plans to return to a 100% equity partnership structure once the merger has bedded in, although there has been no indication of how long this will take.
Poole has said he expects the bar to the equity at the combined firm will be set slightly lower than it currently is at LG, as a result of the scrapping of fixed-share status.
There will be more partner promotions for legacy LG lawyers at the combined firm than there would have been under LG's current structure.
He added that there is no clear idea of how long the transitional period will last but that it would not happen within the first year of the merger.
Poole said: "It is hard to predict how long the transition will take. We anticipate there will be a backlog of partners that will move from fixed share status into the equity. We do not plan to start expanding out the ranks of fixed-share partners so Wragges partners will remain unaffected by the plans."
LG currently offers bonuses but it is expected that there will be no bonus pool in the new structure. Wragges currently does not award bonuses.
Both firms operate with meritocratic pay systems and are expected to continue remunerating their partners based on performance in the new structure.
No lock-in period has been put in place for partners at either firm.
The combination will gift Wragges with the expanded London presence it has been seeking since the turn of the decade. The combined number of partners would reach 189 and combined turnover to £172.3m, putting the firm just outside the UK top 20, according to last year's financial results.
At the end of 2012-13 LG recorded profit per equity partner (PEP) of £260,000, down 14.2% on the previous financial year, while PEP at Wragges climbed by 2.7% to £339,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250