Is Weil's partner exodus a sign trouble is brewing at the firm's London office?
When Weil Gotshal & Manges last year announced 170 redundancies across its associate and support staff ranks, the market was shocked but viewed it as a difficult but necessary decision. A drop in high-profile restructuring and litigation work had contributed to flat global revenues for 2012 against a nearly 9% fall in profits. Executive partner Barry Wolf admitted at the time of announcing the cuts that some partners may decide to leave as a result of "meaningful compensation adjustments for certain partners" due to the changes in the economy, but no numbers were referenced. Since then more than 30 partners – equating to around a tenth of the global partnership – have left. This included at least 17 partners packing up in Houston and Dallas, as well as several senior partners from the firm's east coast bases. Market sentiment suggests at least some of the senior departures represent collateral damage.
January 30, 2014 at 07:03 PM
5 minute read
Despite a strong performance, the firm's City base was hit by six partner exits in 2013. Alex Newman reports
When Weil Gotshal & Manges last year announced 170 redundancies across its associate and support staff ranks, the market was shocked but viewed it as a difficult but necessary decision. A drop in high-profile restructuring and litigation work had contributed to flat global revenues for 2012 against a nearly 9% fall in profits.
Executive partner Barry Wolf admitted at the time of announcing the cuts that some partners may decide to leave as a result of "meaningful compensation adjustments for certain partners" due to the changes in the economy, but no numbers were referenced. Since then more than 30 partners – equating to around a tenth of the global partnership – have left. This included at least 17 partners packing up in Houston and Dallas, as well as several senior partners from the firm's east coast bases. Market sentiment suggests at least some of the senior departures represent collateral damage.
The firm's London office, which had been growing rapidly at partner level in recent years and – in contrast to the US – saw a 22% rise in revenue in 2012, has also been hit by a number of high-profile exits. Of the 31 partners in the office at the beginning of 2013, six – around 20% of the office's senior lawyers – have left. Even for a modestly sized City outpost, this is a significant turnover.
In London the trickle of exits began in May, when private equity partner Mark Soundy left with City tax head Sarah Priestley and associate Simon Burrows. This was later followed by the departures of litigator Matthew Shankland to Sidley Austin, tax partner Brenda Coleman to Ropes & Gray and funds partner Nick Benson, who joined in 2011 as part of a four-partner team from Clifford Chance but left for Latham & Watkins earlier this month. Finance partner Rob Ferguson meanwhile left last September to pursue a course at London Business School.
Added to this list – according to one Weil partner in London – are "quite a lot of associates" who have left the corporate group over the last 18 months, with the perception remaining that the firm could do more to shed its enduring 'we'll getchya and mangle ya' moniker.
Some former partners claim associate turnover has exacerbated senior exits by making it more difficult to build consistent deal teams, while other issues cited include an over-emphasis on private equity and corporate work, at the expense of other practice areas.
One ex-partner, who claims the City office has "never got the balance right", argues strategic moves into fund formation and structured finance work have yielded mixed results, and consequently are still seen as secondary to the stellar private equity buyout practice.
Related to this is the somewhat thorny subject of star partners. "London has hugely over-performed, but there's still a kind of personality that dominates, which makes it hard to join the dots between practices," comments another partner close to the firm. "It's all chiefs and no Indians. Weil sees itself as a number of individuals who work under the same name, not as one firm."
However, for London managing partner and executive committee member Mike Francies – who would not be drawn on the last point – any short-term volatility in partner numbers must be seen in the context of several years of growth.
"Partner and associate moves are becoming more common in the market and we are not immune to that, but the strength of the office has made it relatively easy to recruit new associates," he argues.
"The office has been doing well and was very profitable, but, from 2011, we decided to make a further major investment in London by building on our two market-leading practices: private equity and structured finance. In just over two years, we've achieved a huge amount."
The office was given a further boost this month with the hire of Hogan Lovells banking partner Chris McLaughlin, the fourth lateral hire in London since 2012. In 2011 nine laterals were brought in.
And in fairness to Weil, despite continuing speculation about further departures in London, neither rivals nor ex-partners seem to think the revolving door is going to create significant difficulties in the longer term.
Moreover, assuming that at least some of the departures have been linked to the redundancies announced in the US, the exodus is likely to slow down.
"We obviously announced the big reduction in the workforce and some percentage of the partnership was redefined, and therefore it is not a surprise to see people leaving," contends one Weil partner. "The firm has taken a big decision, but I think we're near the end of it."
A Weil spokesperson in New York declined to comment on the global changes.
London departures in 2013-14
Matthew Shankland, litigation – Sidley Austin
Nick Benson, fund formation – Latham & Watkins
Mark Soundy, private equity – Shearman & Sterling
Sarah Priestley, corporate tax head – Shearman & Sterling
Brenda Coleman, tax – Ropes & Gray
Rob Ferguson, finance – London Business School
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKMPG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250