Taylor Wessing posts 2012/13 fee income hike but profits hit as costs rise
Fee income at Taylor Wessing grew to £101.7m for the 2012-13 financial year, according to the firm's latest limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts. The accounts, filed with Companies House, show that fee income rose 4.4% against the previous year's equivalent, when the firm brought in £97.4m.
January 30, 2014 at 10:14 AM
2 minute read
Fee income at Taylor Wessing grew to £101.7m for the 2012-13 financial year, according to the firm's latest limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts.
The accounts, filed with Companies House, show that fee income rose 4.4% against the previous year's equivalent, when the firm brought in £97.4m.
Last May, the firm disclosed unaudited revenue of £104.5m for its UK arm, marking a 3.6% increase. It posted a profit per equity partner figure of £544,000, down by 10% on the previous year.
The LLP accounts show that net profit during the year fell 2.6% to £29.4m, while operating profit dipped to £38.2m from £38.9m.
Staff costs may have contributed to some of the decline in profit after rising by 9.6% to £41.2m. The cost of salaries at the firm accounted for the bulk of this increase, growing by more than 10% from £29m to £32m.
The highest paid partner at the firm took home £809,530, down 6% on the previous year when they earned an equivalent of £860,550.
The average number of fee-earners during the year increased from 251 to 260, while the number of non-fee earning professionals and support staff grew from 279 to 291, resulting in a 4% rise in staff count. The average number of members was up from 100 to 103.
The accounts also show that Taylor Wessing's document review business New Street Solutions owed the parent firm £180,000 at the 2012-13 year end.
During the year the firm made 15 lateral partner hires globally and 16 internal partner promotions, resulting in a 15% rise in the size of the partnership to 365.
It also gained new offices in Bratislava, Brno in the Czech Republic, Budapest, Kiev, Klagenfurt, Prague, Singapore, Vienna and Warsaw thanks to a merger with Austrian law firm ENWC in May last year and a formal tie-up with Singapore's RHT Law in March.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250