Claimants in Libor test case against Barclays switch advisers for second time
Guardian Care Homes has changed its counsel for the second time in two months in a major dispute against Barclays, seen by many as the test case for Libor manipulation.
February 05, 2014 at 07:19 AM
3 minute read
Guardian Care Homes has changed its advisers for the second time in two months in a major dispute against Barclays, seen by many as the test case for Libor manipulation.
The care home operator's owner, Graiseley Investments, yesterday (4 February) instructed the London office of US firm Hausfeld, just two months after the Wilkes Partnership was bought in to replace litigation boutique Cook Young & Keidan (CYK) as advisors.
Hausfeld London managing partner and former Slaughter and May associate Anthony Maton and partner Lianne Craig have taken on the case for Graiseley, understood to be on a no-win no-fee basis. The firm is already active in a number of Libor-related suits in the US.
The dispute – Barclays Plc v Graiseley Investments & Ors (Guardian Care Homes) – has seen care home provider Guardian attempt to sue Barclays over the alleged mis-selling of interest rate hedging products, known as 'swaps', that the company claims has cost it millions of pounds since 2008 based on manipulated Libor rates.
The case is set to be heard in April and is being closely watched by small businesses which have been sold swaps on the basis they would be protected against interest rate changes.
Legal Week understands one of the issues with the instruction to date has been the huge amount of material disclosed by Barclays, which require larger numbers of lawyers than those available to boutique litigation teams.
"I think it's a confusing choice; Hausfeld may be taking it on a fairly uncommercial basis," commented one senior City banking partner, who has advised clients on potential Libor-related claims.
"The claim's quite a difficult one, and my inkling is that Guardian wants to rip up the swamp, but there's every chance they might get damages."
When the Wolverhampton-based care company first brought the case in 2012, it turned to CYK co-founder Philip Young, alongside Brick Court Chambers' Tim Lord QC and Farhaz Khan from Outer Temple.
In December, the company drafted in the Wilkes Partnership's Andrew Garland, who instructed Bristol set Guildhall Chambers' Stephen Davies QC, alongside John Virgo and Neil Levy, for the trial. Guildhall will continue to act alongside Hausfeld.
Barclays is being advised by Clifford Chance, with litigation partner Ian Moulding in the lead role. The magic circle firm instructed Adrian Beltrami QC and Richard Hanke from 3VB as counsel.
In the US, Hausfeld has already filed a number of class actions around Libor rate-rigging, including cases on behalf of the Mayor of New York and the City of Baltimore Council.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
ENRC and SFO Reach Shock Settlement Over Media Leaks Allegations
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Leaves Statute of Limitations Question in Injury Crash Suit for a Jury
- 2Fighting Injustice: Son Secures Father's Honorable Discharge From U.S. Air Force
- 3'A Giant in the Legal Community': a Fulton County Judge Has Died
- 4Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
- 5Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250