Mayer Brown City revenue dropped 9.5% in 2012-13, filings show
Mayer Brown London fee income fell by 9.5% in the year to 30 April 2013, according to accounts filed with Companies House. The revenue fall came during a year which saw a number of partner departures, though senior lawyer headcount has since rebounded following a string of laterals recruits last autumn.
February 06, 2014 at 10:30 AM
2 minute read
Mayer Brown London fee income fell by 9.5% in the year to 30 April 2013, according to accounts filed with Companies House.
The revenue fall came during a year which saw a number of partner departures, though senior lawyer headcount has since rebounded on the back of a string of lateral recruits last autumn.
But while fee income dropped from £105.8m to £95.8m in 2012-13, operating profit had a smaller dip, falling 5.5% from £31m to £29m.
Net debt fell by 25% to £25.6m, while the net bank overdraft fell from £3.7m to £228,000.
Operating expenses also saw a considerable drop, down 11% to £66.7m, including a 9% decrease in staff costs to £31.2m. Legal and support staff numbers also fell 8.5%, with the equivalent of 14 legal and 26 support staff exiting the office in the year.
The average number of members fell from 98 to 92, providing an average profit per member figure of £310,177. However, the member with the largest entitlement to profit took home £1.16m for the year, 10% up on the previous year's figure of £1.05m.
In a statement, London managing partner Sean Connolly said the year had been a "challenging" one, but that profitability had been maintained "through continued focus on management of cost-base".
"The volume and value of transactional workflows improved in the second half of the year and, when combined with the continued success of our contentious and advisory businesses, meant we ended the year strongly."
Separately, the firm today (6 February) announced it had hired Ashurst partner Julian Elison to its antitrust and competition practice in Brussels.
Elison, who has been involved in many EU and UK Competition Commission cases, has been brought in to support the "increasing M&A activities of our clients", Brussels head Kiran Desai commented.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHogan Lovells, Khaitan Lead On Beverage Company’s $890M Offering In India
Clifford Chance Adds Two Goodwin Leveraged Finance Specialists as Partners in Paris
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1King & Spalding E-Discovery Director Jumps to Nebraska Women-Owned Firm
- 2Nation's Largest Utility Parts Ways With CLO Who Helped It Navigate Bribery Scandal
- 3Advocates Renew Campaign for Immigrant Right to Counsel in New York
- 4From ‘Unregulated’ to ‘A Matter of Great Concern’: PFAS Regulation under Biden
- 5Public Interest Lawyers in NY Fear Rollback of Federal Loan Assistance in '25, Ask Gov. to Add $4M to State Program
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250