Orrick, Bredin Prat advise as Nestle sells €6.5bn stake back to L'Oreal
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe and Bredin Prat are among a quartet of firms landing key roles on L'Oreal's buys back of an €6.5bn (£5.3bn) stake from Swiss food group Nestle.
February 12, 2014 at 11:53 AM
2 minute read
Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe and Bredin Prat are among a quartet of firms landing key roles on L'Oreal's buys back of an €6.5bn (£5.3bn) stake from Swiss food group Nestle.
Nestle is selling off 8% of its stake in the French cosmetics company, reducing its share holding to around 23%.
Nestle initially bought the shares from the Bettencourt-Meyers family, L'Oreal's largest shareholder, in 1974. The shares being sold back to Nestle will be cancelled, which means the family's stake will increase to account for a third of the company.
The deal is partially funded by a disposal by L'Oreal to Nestle of its 50% stake in Swiss dermatology pharmaceuticals company Galderma, a joint venture between the two parties, for € 3.1bn (£2.5bn). The remainder is financed through a €3.4bn (£2.8bn) cash payment.
L'Oreal has turned to Orrick, fielding a team led by M&A partners Jean-Pierre Martel and Alexis Marraud des Grottes.
Bredin Prat senior partner Didier Martin meanwhile led the team representing the Bettencourt-Meyers family.
Nestle is instructing Paris-headquartered firm Darrois Villey Maillot Brochier, which is fielding a team headed up by M&A partners Emmanuel Brochier and Bertrand Cardi. They are flanked by corporate partner Christophe Vinsonneau, tax partner Vincent Agulhon and competition partner Igor Simic.
Nestle also turned to Switzerland's Homburger for advice on the deal. The firm's team included corporate partners Daniel Daeniker and Frank Gerhard and tax partners Dieter Grünblatt and Reto Heuberger.
Law firms recently appointed roles on mandates from Nestle include Mayer Brown, which in 2012 advised the food company on buying Pfizer's infant formula business in an $11.9bn (£7.2bn) deal.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Thrive in Central and Eastern Europe, Law Firms Need to 'Know the Rules of the Game'
7 minute readWhat About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Netflix Offices Raided by Authorities in Paris and Amsterdam
The EU Top 30, 2024: Ranking the Largest Law Firms in the European Union by Headcount
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250