Clydes and 2Birds bolster links between pay and performance
Clyde & Co and Bird & Bird have become the latest firms in the UK top 20 to rejig their associate career paths in a bid to tighten links between pay and individual performance. The moves come as research by Legal Week shows that Clifford Chance (CC) is the only firm in the group that does not base lawyers' salaries on merit. The changes see Clydes move further away from post-qualification experience (PQE) as a measure for pay, with the firm putting in place a clear career development framework for associates. It focuses on performance and clarifying targets for progression.
February 20, 2014 at 04:38 AM
3 minute read
Clifford Chance only top 20 firm with no merit-linked salaries
Clyde & Co and Bird & Bird have become the latest firms in the UK top 20 to rejig their associate career paths in a bid to tighten links between pay and individual performance.
The moves come as research by Legal Week shows that Clifford Chance (CC) is the only firm in the group that does not base lawyers' salaries on merit.
The changes see Clydes move further away from post-qualification experience (PQE) as a measure for pay, with the firm putting in place a clear career development framework for associates. It focuses on performance and clarifying targets for progression.
The system was formally introduced in November, with lawyers from newly qualified (NQ) to two years' PQE classified as junior associates. Lawyers subsequently progress from associate to senior associate at around four years' PQE, with a new legal director tier introduced for those with typically at least six years' experience.
Lawyers are promoted through the ranks based on merit rather than experience, with pay at all levels linked to performance, as it has been for the last two years.
Meanwhile, Bird & Bird is tightening its existing structure by toughening promotion criteria at each level. This means promotion from junior (up to three years' PQE) to mid-level associate, and from mid-level to senior associate (around five years' PQE), is no longer automatic. Instead lawyers will be assessed against five criteria before they can gain promotion: matter management, people management, client management and business development, technical competence and personal qualities.
The firm is also adding winning business as a criterion in determining bonuses.
A spokesperson said: "We see both our salary structures and the mechanisms behind the bonus scheme evolving over the next couple of years to ensure that we incentivise and reward the correct ways of working to match the rapidly changing ways in which we are operating and charging for our services."
The changes at Bird & Bird and Clydes represent the latest in a string of moves by law firms to distance themselves from associate lockstep and instead link basic salary with performance.
Following the news that Linklaters is to introduce merit-based pay for lawyers at two years' PQE, CC is now the only firm in the top 20 without a banding system in place. The firm has no current plans to change this, although associates do not automatically progress through the lockstep.
Slaughter and May, traditionally the most conservative UK firm, last year introduced two salary bands for associates with 4.5 years' PQE and above.
A spokesperson for CC said: "Our current compensation policy is designed to motivate and retain our high-quality lawyers, and while it achieves this objective we see no reason to change it."
CC also operates a bonus structure, with bonuses awarded up to a maximum of 40% of base salary.
Of the top 20 Slaughters and Allen & Overy are the only two firms where performance-based pay kicks in purely for senior associates, with the majority opting to introduce it at around two years' PQE. Some, such as CMS Cameron McKenna, Ashurst and Hogan Lovells, operate merit-based pay from NQ onwards.
- For more analysis, see Can't get no satisfaction – half-hearted rewards system is worse than none at all
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readA&O Shearman Luminary, Former US Co-Chair, to Leave Partnership
Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250