Pure and simple – the most popular Legal Week Law briefings from Q4 2013
The practice of law is often maligned – and sometimes fairly so – as overly complex and inaccessible, with its use of arcane language, dense documents and labyrinthine legislation. But the issues that engage lawyers on a day-to-day basis are often the most simplistic, and, as the most popular briefings on Legal Week Law demonstrate, subjects as straightforward as clear communication, signatures and getting names right remain just as much of interest as ever. The doctrine of misnomer was thrown into the spotlight last year by the case of Liberty Mercian v Cuddy Civil Engineering, which was covered by Macfarlanes in its briefing 'Mistaken identity – the importance of getting names right in contracts', which proved to be one of the top 10 most popular downloads during the last three months of 2013.
February 26, 2014 at 04:30 AM
5 minute read
From a tough lesson on drafting contracts to reports on risk and regulation, Ben Wheway rounds up the most popular briefings and key statistics from Legal Week Law over the last quarter
The practice of law is often maligned – and sometimes fairly so – as overly complex and inaccessible, with its use of arcane language, dense documents and labyrinthine legislation. But the issues that engage lawyers on a day-to-day basis are often the most simplistic, and, as the most popular briefings on Legal Week Law demonstrate, subjects as straightforward as clear communication, signatures and getting names right remain just as much of interest as ever.
The doctrine of misnomer was thrown into the spotlight last year by the case of Liberty Mercian v Cuddy Civil Engineering, which was covered by Macfarlanes in its briefing 'Mistaken identity – the importance of getting names right in contracts', which proved to be one of the top 10 most popular downloads during the last three months of 2013.
The case centred around a construction contract in which Liberty's legal advisers had mistakenly named a dormant company as the contractor after running a Companies House search. As Macfarlanes explained, the judge ruled that it was not a clear mistake, emphasising the high threshold that must be surpassed to persuade the court, and providing a harsh lesson for the lawyers in question.
The importance of absolute clarity in contracts was also starkly illustrated by the second-most popular download during Q4 2013 – Wragge & Co's 'Why clear drafting matters: a case lost by both sides?', which documented a case in which the two parties had failed to clearly record what they had agreed in their rush to sign binding agreements.
The dispute, between Singapore-based online estate agency AllProperty Media and corporate adviser Alegro Capital, saw both sides left hundreds of thousands of pounds out of pocket because of misunderstandings over what they believed Alegro's engagement letter actually said.
Wragges' report on the case was pipped to the top spot for the quarter by Shoosmiths' briefing on electronic signatures, which garnered more than 600 downloads. The article, which looked at recent movements away from the traditional 'wet' signature for corporate deals, provided a succinct overview of the ongoing efforts to find a suitable 'e-alternative' to the handwritten version – a development described as "necessary to the continued growth and development of e-commerce".
The article illustrates how, despite the rapid development of technology and the profession's best efforts at modernisation, traditional practices are still firmly embedded in the way lawyers work, and, as such, progress will often be slow.
Legal Week Law also continues to serve as a great forum for more wide-ranging projects, with Berwin Leighton Paisner partner Matthew Whalley's latest legal risk report, 'Unknown unknowns – why company executives cannot afford to ignore legal risk', also featuring highly among the quarter's top 10 downloads.
The study, which drew on the responses of 100 CEOs, senior in-house lawyers and compliance professionals, found that 80% of company executives have little or no confidence in their organisation's ability to manage emerging legal risk – a subject on which relatively scant attention has been focused to date.
Similar subjects were also addressed by Winston & Strawn's international business risk survey, the results of which provided the basis for the firm's well-read report 'Compete and comply – the four key business risk concerns for corporate counsel'.
The report, which was broken down into four sections – data protection, competition regulation, bribery and corruption, and joint ventures and strategic alliances in emerging markets – shed light on the primary concerns keeping senior in-house counsel awake at night.
The top concerns identified by the report included: customer data issues, including security and data usage risks; loss of brand equity and/or consumer confidence; vertical agreements with suppliers and competitors; and differing cultural practices in high-growth markets such as those in the Asia-Pacific region.
Risk and regulatory concerns in emerging markets were also tackled by the latest in Pinsent Masons' 'Don't make a drama out of a crisis' series, which emphasised the importance of internal investigations, as enforcement activity continues to rise in the wake of the enactment of the Bribery Act, a subject of enduring interest on Legal Week Law.
And rounding off the top 10 downloads for Q4 2013 was the latest updated edition of Latham & Watkins' ever-popular glossary of global M&A jargon, which – with handy definitions of terms such as bear hugs, BIMBOs, cramdowns and creepers – proves that even though the simplest concepts may be the most popular, an encylopaedic resource of technical terminology is still an essential part of the modern lawyer's desktop.
Click here to view the most popular downloads in numbers.
If you are not already signed up for Legal Week Law, you can click here to complete your free registration and gain access to our database of almost 6,000 legal briefings.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4a/f6/62f476814a4bbe57b17e0afd2bdd/deepseek-app-4-767x633.jpg)
DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause
4 minute read![What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends? What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9c/47/f55d72654a2f9fc53f8bd33ff307/business-handshake-767x633.jpg)
What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
![Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/08/Indian-Flag-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform
![Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/04/Moscow-Russia-767x633.jpg)
Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250