Simpson Thacher, CC, Travers act on £1.2bn Pets at Home IPO
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Clifford Chance (CC) and Travers Smith have advised on the £1.2bn initial public offering (IPO) of Pets at Home Group. Private equity house KKR, which owns the pet superstore, turned to regular advisers Simpson Thacher, led by M&A partner Adam Signy. CC acted for the banks, which included Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Travers meanwhile took a role advising management, led by tax partner Russell Warren and corporate partner Adrian West.
March 19, 2014 at 08:03 AM
2 minute read
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, Clifford Chance (CC) and Travers Smith have advised on the £1.2bn initial public offering (IPO) of Pets at Home Group.
Private equity house KKR, which owns the pet superstore, turned to regular advisers Simpson Thacher, led by M&A partner Adam Signy.
CC acted for the banks, which included Goldman Sachs and Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
Travers meanwhile took a role advising management, led by tax partner Russell Warren and corporate partner Adrian West.
The deal represents a the second time Simpson Thacher and Travers have come together to advise on a Pets at Home deal, landing roles in 2010 alongside DLA Piper on KKR's acquisition of the brand for almost £1bn. On that occasion Travers advised the sellers Bridgepoint Capital while DLA advised management.
The deal represents the latest in a string of IPOs in recent months, with the retail sector in particular seeing a number of listings.
On Monday (17 March), online takeaway company Just Eat announced its intention to list around £100m of shares, handing roles to Herbert Smith Freehills and Linklaters.
Last month Allen & Overy and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer won mandates on British discount retailer Poundland's proposed stock market flotation.
Warren commented: "This is one of a number of large IPOs taking place in the market, there is a clear appetite for this at the moment."
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPérez-Llorca, Deloitte Legal and White & Case behind €1B Green Deal in Spain
South Africa Regulator’s Staffing Problems Leave High-Stakes M&A Deals in Limbo
4 minute readGoodwin, Conyers, A&O Shearman Act on $800M China Biotech Sale
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250