Quinn scores victory for China's Baidu in case over blocked search engine results
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan has successfully defended Chinese internet company Baidu in a high profile case brought against it by a group of Chinese political activists.
March 28, 2014 at 01:20 AM
2 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan has successfully defended Chinese internet company Baidu in a high profile case brought against it by a group of Chinese political activists.
The eight dissidents, who are PRC citizens but reside in New York, claimed that the search engine – akin to Google and Yahoo – violated their civil rights by blocking from its search results their pro-democracy articles and recordings.
The complaint was filed in the New York in 2011 with the dissidents claiming $16m in damages. They accused Baidu of illegally conspiring to prevent US internet users from accessing their work at the behest of China.
The case raised the issue of whether free speech rights – which include the right to remain silent or not publish information – apply to results produced by Internet search engines.
In a landmark judgment yesterday, Judge Jesse Furman ruled that the First Amendment protected Baidu's – and therefore other search engines' – rights to "exercise editorial control" over the order and content of the search results they return.
Media and technology disputes partner Carey Ramos was the lead attorney at Quinn Emanuel on the case. He was previously based in New York but moved to Hong Kong in October last year to help launch the firm's Hong Kong office alongside former Kim & Chang senior arbitration lawyer John Rhie.
Acting for the Chinese dissidents was New York appellate lawyer Stephen Preziosi.
Commenting on the decision, Ramos said: "This case is a ringing endorsement of the core values at the heart of the First Amendment.
"It shows that our courts protect the right of all media to choose what they publish. That right extends to Internet media as well as print media. And it protects Chinese media as much as American media."
Quinn Emanuel opened its first Asia office in Tokyo in 2007, followed by Sydney and Hong Kong last year.
Since launching in Hong Kong, the firm – which has previously acted for Baidu on an internet security case – has also been appointed to advise China's biggest e-commerce company; Alibaba.
Related: Quinn adds to Asia presence with planned Hong Kong launch
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 111th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 2Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 3'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 4Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250