Macfarlanes adopts 'CV-blind' policy in 2014 graduate recruitment round
Macfarlanes has adopted a 'CV-blind' policy for places on its vacation schemes in an effort to increase diversity at the firm.
April 01, 2014 at 06:20 AM
3 minute read
Macfarlanes has adopted a 'CV-blind' policy for places on its vacation schemes in an effort to increase diversity at the firm.
Macfarlanes usually receives around 1,000 applications every year for its Easter and summer vacation schemes and decided to trial blind interviewing on 180 successful applicants during its graduate open days which were held in February and March.
Out of the 180 applicants inverviewed, 52 have been offered a place across the firm's three vacation schemes – one in Easter and two in the summer. Each year the firm typically offers places to between 50-55 graduates.
While invitations to open days are still based on candidates' CVs, the day itself includes a range of exercises which are unrelated to CVs. In the blind interviews, partners are given only the candidate's name and no details of their educational background, allowing them to score their performance based on the interview alone.
Many students who get a place on the vacation scheme then go on to secure a training contract with the firm. The firm is considering extending blind interviewing for assessment days which take place between now and the autumn for training contracts at the firm.
The policy is being driven by the firm's trainee solicitor committee and graduate recruitment team which includes the firm's head of diversity Nicola Richards and head of recruitment Sean Lavin (pictured).
Lavin said: "The lack of diversity in the profession is well known. We keep our recruitment procedures under constant review and blind interviewing seemed to us to be reasonably simple to introduce. If this small step helps to eliminate any bias in favour for or against candidates from particular backgrounds then we regard that as a good thing."
In March Macfarlanes offered training contracts to six trainees, with all accepting a place.
This year Macfarlanes also increased the number of universities it targeted, developing links with Lancaster, Reading, Sussex and Newcastle for the first time. The firm has also joined up with Rare Recruitment in a bid to build connections with students at a broader range of universities.
Clifford Chance was the first UK law firm to introduce a blind CV process in 2013.
In the first year of the recruitment initiative, the firm's annual 100-strong trainee intake came from 41 different education institutions, up by 28% on the previous year when trainees came from a pool of 32 institutions.
The firm put the "CV blind" process in place for the final interview stage with candidates following a comprehensive review of its selection process, in a push to reduce bias towards Oxbridge and other leading universities.
Mayer Brown is also planning to introduce the blind CV policy into its London office this year in a bid to boost social diversity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute read'But We Exist': The Stigma Around Disability and Neurodivergence in Law Firms Persists
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250