Hogan Lovells salaried partners to put in up to £100k each as firm prepares for HMRC change
Hogan Lovells has asked its non-equity partners to contribute up to £100,000 in capital to the firm in response to limited liability partnership (LLP) tax changes being brought by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).
April 03, 2014 at 09:25 AM
2 minute read
Hogan Lovells has asked its non-equity partners to contribute up to £100,000 in capital to the firm in response to limited liability partnership (LLP) tax changes being brought by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC).
Around 65 salaried partners at the firm will have to contribute between £60,000-£100,000 each to meet the new requirements. The firm has said that loans will be available from banks on the same terms as those available to equity members.
HMRC published proposals for changes to the LLP tax regime in December.
It intends to close a loophole in existing legislation that allows partners with a low stake of the equity to be termed as self-employed, meaning that firms can avoid paying national insurance contributions (NIC) for them.
According to HMRC's new rules, firms must put in place a binding commitment to increase capital before 6 April, with capital to be contributed within three months of the date.
A spokesperson for Hogan Lovells said: "We are having to act in anticipation of the final rules, which come into effect from 6 April.
"Our approach is to ensure that the terms for non-equity members are fair to both them and the firm and that our non-equity members are treated by HMRC as the partners that they are. The capital itself doesn't need to be paid until early July."
Several firms are reviewing their capital contribution structures in response to the upcoming changes, including Baker & McKenzie. Bakers is asking approximately 25 non-equity partners in its London office to contribute just over a quarter of expected annual earnings in order to exempt them from employee status.
Field Fisher Waterhouse is looking at a similar deal for any of its 50 or so UK-based fixed-share partners who could be caught out by the new rules, though financial director Mike Giles anticipated that "not many" partners will be affected by the changes. The firm does not have any salaried partners.
Related: Junior partners gear up to make capital contributions as new LLP rules kick in
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMalaysia’s Shearn Delamore Set To Expand Local Footprint With New Office Launch
CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising
‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Trending Stories
- 1FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 2‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 3Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 4Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
- 5DOT Nominee Duffy Pledges Safety, Faster Infrastructure Spending in Confirmation Hearing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250