Linklaters mulls tie-up with PRC firm pending clarity on Shanghai FTZ rules
Linklaters is mulling plans to ally with a top tier Chinese law firm under incoming regulations allowing joint working between international and local outfits in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone (FTZ).
May 12, 2014 at 12:30 AM
4 minute read
Linklaters is mulling plans to ally with a top tier Chinese law firm under incoming regulations allowing joint working between international and local outfits in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone (FTZ).
The magic circle firm, which has offices in Beijing and Shanghai, is looking at the possibility of tying up with a Chinese outfit so it can offer PRC law advice to clients in core practices such as corporate, finance and litigation.
Marc Harvey, Linklaters' managing partner for Asia, told Legal Week that the firm was awaiting clarification on the new rules for lawyers.
"The pronouncement is that the benefits of the SFTZ will be extended to law firms. We've been looking at our next move in China for some time and that is something that interests us a great deal," he said.
"We're looking very closely at the detail of that announcement and what it really means and what you have to do should we decide to tie up with a firm.
"We talk to our friends in the mainland all the time, but there's a waiting game being played slightly. There are some broader brush strokes that look quite appealing – they would give an opportunity for us to second in PRC lawyers and then be in a position to offer China law opinions. But how you accomplish that and whether there are any limitations are yet to be nailed down."
Launched in September 2013, the Shanghai FTZ is the first significant step by the Chinese government to begin opening up the country's service sectors.
As a pilot scheme, it aims to test liberalisation in key areas such as telecoms, financial and legal, with reforms set to allow increased foreign ownership and participation in the economy.
According to recent reports, the regulation will allow a foreign law firm with a representative office in China to enter into an agreement with a Chinese outfit to mutually dispatch lawyers to each other's offices. It will also allow firms to set up joint ventures in the FTZ, whereby they could jointly advise clients on PRC and international law.
"[Whether we tie up with someone] will depend on the final fall of the regulations," said Harvey, adding that the choice of firm would also be affected.
"It might be easier to integrate with a smaller firm but there may not be any point if what you want to achieve is access to a greater client base or a particular practice area that is not in that firm."
Outside of Shanghai, Linklaters is also looking to grow its offices in Korea and Singapore, having opened an office in Seoul and acquired its Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) licence in Singapore last year.
Currently in Seoul it has two partners on the ground – corporate finance partner Hyung Ahn and energy and projects lawyer Stephen Le Vesconte – while in Singapore the focus has been predominantly on cross border work.
"Korea has worked out quite well for us, but it needs to grow," said Harvey. "We want to have the finance side, the corporate side and ultimately depending on where we get to with the full liberalisation, we could have litigation.
"In Singapore we want to grow out Singapore law. I think there is a great opportunity for us to expand in South East Asia."
Elsewhere in the region he said the existing offering was mostly complete, both in terms of practices and geographical coverage.
Last year the firm saw an increase in Asia revenues, with banking, capital markets and litigation among its busiest areas.
In addition to three lateral hires in the region, it also promoted six new lawyers to partner and added seven new counsel. In 2014, the plan is to achieve double digit revenue growth.
"I think the markets are coming back, so I think it is realistic that we could grow our revenues in Asia by 15% this year," Harvey added. "Politically things have been very active in Asia, but once things settle down, corporate stands to be the single greatest beneficiary, along with of course our contentious practice."
Related: Linklaters reveals largest increases in 2014 associate pay
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Long Hours, Lack Of Boundaries: Associates In India Are Leaving Their Firms
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250