Field Fisher Waterhouse cuts 15 secretarial roles in London
Field Fisher Waterhouse has made 15 secretaries redundant in its London offices.
May 15, 2014 at 11:12 AM
2 minute read
Field Fisher Waterhouse has made 15 secretaries redundant in its London offices.
The job cuts are the result of a secretarial review conducted by the firm over the past five months.
In a statement, the firm said: "Like many other firms across the City, we have reviewed the changing nature of our administrative services against our evolving business needs going forward. We have developed a new structure for administrative support which offers greater flexibility and responsiveness for all our fee earners.
"It is always sad to lose longstanding colleagues, however these changes will ensure that we are resourced appropriately and remain competitive."
Field Fisher declined to comment on the packages offered to those staff asked to leave. A spokesperson for the firm did not disclose any details relating to its new administrative support model, but said that the structure factors in new technology systems.
The news comes as the firm is set to move its London headquarters to Thames-side site Riverbank House during the last week of May.
The office move will combine the firm's City practice in one site. It is currently split between its two buildings at Vine Street and Ibex House in the Minories.
A host of City firms have launched redundancy consultations in recent months. CMS Cameron McKenna (CMS UK) and Dundas & Wilson jointly cut 60 support staff roles last month following a consultation ahead of their merger, which went live on 1 May.
Of these, 40 jobs were lost at legacy Dundas, while CMS UK and its third-party providers Integreon, Initial and Xerox saw a combined 20 jobs go.
Last month DWF cut 19 business services roles after a redundancy consultation put 21 business services positions in its finance department at risk, while Ince & Co confirmed it had cut 10 fee-earning positions and six support staff roles in London. In March, Stephenson Harwood concluded a review that resulted in 27 secretarial job losses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readMayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Saudi Arabia—Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Global Law Firms
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 2Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
- 3Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Firms Entering Saudi Arabia
- 4A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Becoming Clerk of the Forum
- 5Pa. Supreme Court Taps New Philadelphia Family Division Administrative Judge
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250