Integreon takes on Dundas staff as CMS UK claims merger will build on firm's strength
CMS Cameron McKenna's back office outsourcing partner Integreon has taken on 20 staff from Dundas & Wilson's support team following this month's merger between the two firms.
May 15, 2014 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
CMS Cameron McKenna's back office outsourcing partner Integreon has taken on 20 staff from Dundas & Wilson's support team following this month's merger between the two firms.
The former Dundas staff will support the combined firm onsite in CMS's offices working across Integreon's finance, learning and development, training, document production, HR and knowledge management units.
The legacy firms jointly cut 60 support staff roles before the merger, with 40 support jobs at Dundas affected and 20 posts cut at CMS, although some of the latter were employed through Integreon and fellow third-party providers Initial and Xerox. In addition, CMS UK has started sending work to legacy Dundas' paralegal-led legal services unit in Glasgow, which currently staffs 17 lawyers and is intended to cut costs for clients.
The move is what CMS UK managing partner Duncan Weston describes as "one of the benefits" of the £227m tie-up, although he stresses that only a small number of matters are currently being referred to the Glasgow unit.
"I anticipate volumes will increase in future but for now they remain nominal," adds Weston. "It's a relatively small part of the business but it may grow."
The Scottish merger has attracted criticism from some quarters, with one former CMS partner suggesting it was centred around "courting more low-cost, high-volume work". According to the partner, the union will boost "turnover, not profitability".
Weston, however, insists that the tie-up is "not a low-cost resourcing proposition" and has forecast profit growth for the combined firm.
"We [CMS] did the deal for three reasons: first, to achieve UK growth, which we have by 25%; second, to build on our core strengths of financial services and energy; and third, to acquire Dundas as an asset with high-quality lawyers," he says.
"We have never positioned this as a transformational merger, but it is a way for the UK firm to increase in size and turnover, and to increase the depth of our offering in the financial services and energy sectors so that we can establish ourselves as a major player in those areas. We are leveraging work in and out of the City, depending on its cost profile."
CMS UK sharpened its sector focus last summer to prioritise four of its eight key areas: energy, life sciences, financial institutions and technology, media and telecoms.
"We are setting up in locations to exploit our key sectors. Dundas was the important piece of the puzzle we were lucky to find, and formed part of our main strategy," explains Weston.
However, market observers remain sceptical over whether the firm has chosen to bulk up in the right places, particularly with the US and Asia-Pacific remaining obvious gaps in its coverage.
"I suspect the Dundas merger will not add a great deal to CMS's capabilities," comments one former partner. "There does not seem to be any visionary strategy. CMS still lacks the US, but more importantly it lacks the quality it needs to succeed."
"We prioritise the US as a market we want to know better, and we are also researching expansion to other markets such as Australia," Weston counters. "It is an ongoing journey that takes a lot of time and effort – it is not something we can do overnight."
He adds that the firm is currently concentrating on its office moves in London, Paris, Frankfurt and Russia – all set to take place this year.
On the Dundas side of the deal, CMS Scotland executive partner Caryn Penley – who was previously co-managing partner at the legacy Scottish firm – says the merger has allowed the firm to "gain an international brand we could not have had in our previous form".
"It is about two firms with a similar culture and compatible client business joining together. Everything has come together so easily from day one and we have had fantastic feedback," says Penley.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIs KPMG’s Arizona ABS Strategy a Turning Point in U.S. Law? What London’s Experience Reveals
5 minute readKPMG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Class Action Accusing Dave's Killer Bread of Mislabeling Protein Contents Cleared to Continue, Judge Rules
- 2SEC Files Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Over Untimely Twitter Ownership Disclosure
- 3Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 4FTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
- 5Womble Bond Dickinson's Wilmington Office Sees New Leadership as Merger Is Completed
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250