Norton Rose Fulbright ups paternity pay as firm brings in raft of policy changes
Norton Rose Fulbright has improved its paternity leave packages and simplified maternity pay, scrapping its return-to-work bonus system in a bid to improve staff retention.
May 18, 2014 at 07:08 PM
3 minute read
Norton Rose Fulbright has improved its paternity leave packages and simplified maternity pay, scrapping its return-to-work bonus system in a bid to improve staff retention.
The moves are among a raft of changes the firm is making as rivals in the City prepare to adapt to new rules on maternity and paternity leave, set to come in next year.
All Norton Rose staff with 52 weeks' continuous service with the firm in London are now eligible for up to 28 weeks of maternity leave on full pay, distributed on a monthly basis.
The new package replaces the firm's previous system in which maternity pay was scaled down over time. Under the old system, fee earners and senior support staff on maternity leave would receive six weeks' worth of full pay, followed by 12 weeks on 50% and then 22 weeks on 25%, equalling 17.5 weeks full pay. This was followed by three additional lump sum return-to-work bonuses, each equivalent to four weeks' full pay, meaning total maternity pay for those returning to work was 29.5 weeks.
The new system will see non-managerial support staff gain up to 10 weeks' extra full pay. Previously they were entitled to six weeks' full pay followed by 12 weeks on 50% and a further six weeks of full pay, offered in a lump sum upon their return to work.
Diversity and inclusion manager Sacha de Klerk said: "It is important that our employees are able to access their income when they need it. Under the new policy they can take time out without worrying about their income and rushing back to work. We wanted to make sure our policies were all inclusive and that they were useful for everyone at the firm."
De Klerk added that lawyers and staff at the firm typically take around nine months' leave.
Meanwhile, paternity pay for fee earners and staff has increased from one week's full pay plus the statutory rate of £138.38 or 90% of earnings, to two weeks' full pay.
The moves, which took effect at the start of this month, are among a series of changes to the firm's policies following a consultation spanning several months.
The firm has adjusted its adoption policy so that the primary and secondary adopters respectively receive the enhanced maternity and paternity packages. It has also changed its surrogacy policy to reflect its maternity and paternity policy.
Meanwhile both men and women are now entitled to four days' leave on full pay for fertility treatment.
De Klerk spearheaded the consultation alongside competition partner Peter Scott and corporate finance partner Maria Ross.
The news comes as other firms are preparing to review their paternity policies in light of new Government policy that allows parents to share parental leave from April 2015.
Ahead of the change, Berwin Leighton Paisner is planning to introduce enhanced paternity packages for all staff, although it has not formalised a new policy.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, which is reviewing its policy over the summer, is set to make a decision in September.
- Click here to provide feedback on your firm's benefits in Legal Week Intelligence's annual Employee Satisfaction Survey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute read'I Was Getting Straight Nos From Absolutely Everyone': How a Tetraplegic Linklaters Lawyer Defied All Odds
6 minute readUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'If the Job Is Better, You Get Better': Chief District Judge Discusses Overcoming Negative Perceptions
- 2It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Worst of Times
- 3Class Action Accusing Dave's Killer Bread of Mislabeling Protein Contents Cleared to Continue, Judge Rules
- 4SEC Files Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Over Untimely Twitter Ownership Disclosure
- 5Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250