Accounts uncovered: UK top 50 spend £5.4bn on staff costs as austerity era draws to a close
The UK's 50 largest law firms by revenue spent a combined £5.4bn on staff costs in the 2012-13 financial year – equating to just over 40% of turnover on average.
May 22, 2014 at 07:03 PM
5 minute read
The UK's 50 largest law firms by revenue spent a combined £5.4bn on staff costs in the 2012-13 financial year – equating to just over 40% of turnover on average.
Total spend was up year-on-year according to exclusive analysis of limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts filed with Companies House carried out for Legal Week by accounting giant EY.
The research found spend across the group increased by 3.2%, with cost as a percentage of revenue staying broadly static at 41%, despite many firms actively looking to cut the cost of their support services in recent years.
In 2011-12 the firms – which do not include Slaughter and May or Osborne Clarke, as they have not converted to LLPs – spent £5.2bn, or an average of £108.9m per firm, according to the accounts. This compares with £5.4bn in 2012-13, or an average of £112.4m each.
According to EY's research, the group spent £65,900 per employee in 2012-13, up 0.4% on the £65,700 per employee spent the previous year. Looking at the spend based on lawyer numbers it equates to £123,100 per lawyer, virtually identical to the £123,300 average spend recorded in 2011-12.
George Bull, head of the professional practices group at accountant Baker Tilly, believes that the relatively flat staff spending from the top firms reflects an emergence from several years of austerity. "We are coming out of cost-cutting and looking at the return of growth," he told Legal Week.
"By 2012-13 most firms had done several rounds of cost-cutting already. We've had several difficult years but now firms are worried about losing some of their people, so we are seeing targeted incentives for the employees firms want to keep, rather than across the board increases or decreases [in staff costs]."
Firms seeing the largest increases in staff costs included several that underwent mergers during the 2012-13 financial year, such as Pinsent Masons and DWF, both of which saw spend rise by more than 40% year on year. Meanwhile, Clyde & Co saw costs climb by 24.7% following a period of rapid expansion in the wake of the previous year's tie-up with Barlow Lyde & Gilbert, with headcount climbing 15%.
Among those firms seeing staff costs grow without opening in new jurisdictions or carrying out mergers, Macfarlanes was a significant outlier. The single-office City firm increased costs by 13.2% from £29.8m to £33.7m.
In contrast, firms cutting costs significantly over the period included Gateley (12.4%), legacy Lawrence Graham (11.7%) and Irwin Mitchell (9.7%).
Overall, non-partner staff numbers were up across the top 50 firms, growing by 4.7% from an average of 1,452.9 to 1,520.6. The largest headcount reductions came at legacy Lawrence Graham, which cut numbers by 9.9%, and Dentons, which saw a 6.6% drop.
Four firms in the top 50 spent more than half of their turnover on staff costs during the 2012-13 financial year: BLM (58.9%), DAC Beachcroft (53.2%), Shoosmiths (52.6%) and Dentons UKMEA (51%). Within the 10 largest UK firms by revenue, the top spenders were Linklaters at 47.4%, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (45.1%) and Clifford Chance (CC) at 43.9%.
Freshfields and Linklaters were the only firms to spend more than £100,000 per employee. They increased their cost per staff member by 2.7% (to £121,500) and 1.7% (to £132,200) respectively, while magic circle rival Allen & Overy reduced its spend by 3.2% to £94,800. CC spent £99,200 per employee, up just £100 on the previous year.
Despite spending more on their staff, Freshfields and Linklaters were two of the firms to most significantly slash member numbers, cutting partner headcount by 5.1% and 6.1% respectively. Only Nabarro (13.3%), CMS (10.5%) and Kennedys (6.3%) saw bigger reductions in member numbers.
"There are significant differences between the number of support staff and fee earners per member across firms," says Michael Radcliffe, a director from the fraud investigation and dispute services department at EY. "These benchmarking exercises can prompt change because if firms see themselves paying more in support staff costs than anyone else they will start to question it."
Click here for magic circle support staff costs
- How highly are you valued by your law firm? Click here to take part in Legal Week Intelligence's annual employee satisfaction survey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250