Accounts uncovered: UK top 50 spend £5.4bn on staff costs as austerity era draws to a close
The UK's 50 largest law firms by revenue spent a combined £5.4bn on staff costs in the 2012-13 financial year – equating to just over 40% of turnover on average.
May 22, 2014 at 07:03 PM
5 minute read
The UK's 50 largest law firms by revenue spent a combined £5.4bn on staff costs in the 2012-13 financial year – equating to just over 40% of turnover on average.
Total spend was up year-on-year according to exclusive analysis of limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts filed with Companies House carried out for Legal Week by accounting giant EY.
The research found spend across the group increased by 3.2%, with cost as a percentage of revenue staying broadly static at 41%, despite many firms actively looking to cut the cost of their support services in recent years.
In 2011-12 the firms – which do not include Slaughter and May or Osborne Clarke, as they have not converted to LLPs – spent £5.2bn, or an average of £108.9m per firm, according to the accounts. This compares with £5.4bn in 2012-13, or an average of £112.4m each.
Click here to view law firm support staff numbers and costs
Click here for magic circle support staff costs
According to EY's research, the group spent £65,900 per employee in 2012-13, up 0.4% on the £65,700 per employee spent the previous year. Looking at the spend based on lawyer numbers it equates to £123,100 per lawyer, virtually identical to the £123,300 average spend recorded in 2011-12.
George Bull, head of the professional practices group at accountant Baker Tilly, believes that the relatively flat staff spending from the top firms reflects an emergence from several years of austerity. "We are coming out of cost-cutting and looking at the return of growth," he told Legal Week.
"By 2012-13 most firms had done several rounds of cost-cutting already. We've had several difficult years but now firms are worried about losing some of their people, so we are seeing targeted incentives for the employees firms want to keep, rather than across the board increases or decreases [in staff costs]."
Firms seeing the largest increases in staff costs included several that underwent mergers during the 2012-13 financial year, such as Pinsent Masons and DWF, both of which saw spend rise by more than 40% year on year. Meanwhile, Clyde & Co saw costs climb by 24.7% following a period of rapid expansion in the wake of the previous year's tie-up with Barlow Lyde & Gilbert, with headcount climbing 15%.
Among those firms seeing staff costs grow without opening in new jurisdictions or carrying out mergers, Macfarlanes was a significant outlier. The single-office City firm increased costs by 13.2% from £29.8m to £33.7m.
In contrast, firms cutting costs significantly over the period included Gateley (12.4%), legacy Lawrence Graham (11.7%) and Irwin Mitchell (9.7%).
Overall, non-partner staff numbers were up across the top 50 firms, growing by 4.7% from an average of 1,452.9 to 1,520.6. The largest headcount reductions came at legacy Lawrence Graham, which cut numbers by 9.9%, and Dentons, which saw a 6.6% drop.
Click here to view law firm support staff numbers and costs
Click here for magic circle support staff costs
Four firms in the top 50 spent more than half of their turnover on staff costs during the 2012-13 financial year: BLM (58.9%), DAC Beachcroft (53.2%), Shoosmiths (52.6%) and Dentons UKMEA (51%). Within the 10 largest UK firms by revenue, the top spenders were Linklaters at 47.4%, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (45.1%) and Clifford Chance (CC) at 43.9%.
Freshfields and Linklaters were the only firms to spend more than £100,000 per employee. They increased their cost per staff member by 2.7% (to £121,500) and 1.7% (to £132,200) respectively, while magic circle rival Allen & Overy reduced its spend by 3.2% to £94,800. CC spent £99,200 per employee, up just £100 on the previous year.
Despite spending more on their staff, Freshfields and Linklaters were two of the firms to most significantly slash member numbers, cutting partner headcount by 5.1% and 6.1% respectively. Only Nabarro (13.3%), CMS (10.5%) and Kennedys (6.3%) saw bigger reductions in member numbers.
"There are significant differences between the number of support staff and fee earners per member across firms," says Michael Radcliffe, a director from the fraud investigation and dispute services department at EY. "These benchmarking exercises can prompt change because if firms see themselves paying more in support staff costs than anyone else they will start to question it."
Click here to view law firm support staff numbers and costs
Click here for magic circle support staff costs
- How highly are you valued by your law firm? Click here to take part in Legal Week Intelligence's annual employee satisfaction survey.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4a/f6/62f476814a4bbe57b17e0afd2bdd/deepseek-app-4-767x633.jpg)
DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause
4 minute read![What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends? What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9c/47/f55d72654a2f9fc53f8bd33ff307/business-handshake-767x633.jpg)
What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
![Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/08/Indian-Flag-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform
![Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/04/Moscow-Russia-767x633.jpg)
Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Pick for SEC Chair Likely to Stymie Shareholder Proposals from ESG Advocates
- 2Adobe’s Chief Cyber Legal & Privacy Officer Talks Managing Gen AI Risks, Cyber Training
- 3The M&A Partners Who Drove the Most Business as Deal Leads Last Year
- 4Recent Ford Bronco Battery Recall Draws Pa. Class Action
- 5Office of Special Counsel Chief Challenges Firing 'Without Cause'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250